Eugenics in the USA
The concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race did not originate-with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement's campaign for ethnic cleansing.
Eugenics was the racist pseudoscience determined to wipe away all human beings deemed "unfit," preserving only those who conformed to a Nordic stereotype. Elements of the philosophy were enshrined as national policy by forced sterilization and segregation laws, as well as marriage restrictions, enacted in twenty-seven states. In 1909, California became the third state to adopt such laws. Ultimately, eugenics practitioners coercively sterilized some 60,000 Americans, barred the marriage of thousands, forcibly segregated thousands in "colonies," and persecuted untold numbers in ways we are just learning. Before World War II, nearly half of coercive sterilizations were done in California, and even after the war, the state accounted for a third of all such surgeries.
California was considered an epicenter of the American eugenics movement. During the Twentieth Century's first decades, California's eugenicists included potent but little known race scientists, such as Army venereal disease specialist Dr. Paul Popenoe, citrus magnate and Polytechnic benefactor Paul Gosney, Sacramento banker Charles M. Goethe, as well as members of the California State Board of Charities and Corrections and the University of California Board of Regents.
Eugenics would have been so much bizarre parlor talk had it not been for extensive financing by corporate philanthropies, specifically the Carnegie Institution, the Rockefeller Foundation and the Harriman railroad fortune. They were all in league with some of America's most respected scientists hailing from such prestigious universities as Stamford, Yale, Harvard, and Princeton. These academicians espoused race theory and race science, and then faked and twisted data to serve eugenics' racist aims.
Stanford president David Starr Jordan originated the notion of "race and blood" in his 1902 racial epistle "Blood of a Nation," in which the university scholar declared that human qualities and conditions such as talent and poverty were passed through the blood.
In 1904, the Carnegie Institution established a laboratory complex at Cold Spring Harbor on Long Island that stockpiled millions of index cards on ordinary Americans, as researchers carefully plotted the removal of families, bloodlines and whole peoples. From Cold Spring Harbor, eugenics advocates agitated in the legislatures of America, as well as the nation's social service agencies and associations.
The Harriman railroad fortune paid local charities, such as the New York Bureau of Industries and Immigration, to seek out Jewish, Italian and other immigrants in New York and other crowded cities and subject them to deportation, trumped up confinement or forced sterilization.
The Rockefeller Foundation helped found the German eugenics program and even funded the program that Josef Mengele worked in before he went to Auschwitz.
Much of the spiritual guidance and political agitation for the American eugenics movement came from California's quasi-autonomous eugenic societies, such as the Pasadena-based Human Betterment Foundation and the California branch of the American Eugenics Society, which coordinated much of their activity with the Eugenics Research Society in Long Island. These organizations--which functioned as part of a closely-knit network--published racist eugenic newsletters and pseudoscientific journals, such as Eugenical News and Eugenics, and propagandized for the Nazis.
Eugenics was born as a scientific curiosity in the Victorian age. In 1863, Sir Francis Galton, a cousin of Charles Darwin, theorized that if talented people only married other talented people, the result would be measurably better offspring. At the turn of the last century, Galton's ideas were imported into the United States just as Gregor Mendel's principles of heredity were rediscovered. American eugenic advocates believed with religious fervor that the same Mendelian concepts determining the color and size of peas, corn and cattle also governed the social and intellectual character of man.
In an America demographically reeling from immigration upheaval and torn by post-Reconstruction chaos, race conflict was everywhere in the early twentieth century. Elitists, utopians and so-called "progressives" fused their smoldering race fears and class bias with their desire to make a better world. They reinvented Galton's eugenics into a repressive and racist ideology. The intent: populate the earth with vastly more of their own socio-economic and biological kind--and less or none of everyone else.
The superior species the eugenics movement sought was populated not merely by tall, strong, talented people. Eugenicists craved blond, blue-eyed Nordic types. This group alone, they believed, was fit to inherit the earth. In the process, the movement intended to subtract emancipated Negroes, immigrant Asian laborers, Indians, Hispanics, East Europeans, Jews, dark-haired hill folk, poor people, the infirm and really anyone classified outside the gentrified genetic lines drawn up by American raceologists.
How? By identifying so-called "defective" family trees and subjecting them to lifelong segregation and sterilization programs to kill their bloodlines. The grand plan was to literally wipe away the reproductive capability of those deemed weak and inferior--the so-called "unfit." The eugenicists hoped to neutralize the viability of 10 percent of the population at a sweep, until none were left except themselves.
Eighteen solutions were explored in a Carnegie-supported 1911 "Preliminary Report of the Committee of the Eugenic Section of the American Breeder's Association to Study and to Report on the Best Practical Means for Cutting Off the Defective Germ-Plasm in the Human Population." Point eight was euthanasia.
The most commonly suggested method of eugenicide in America was a "lethal chamber" or public locally operated gas chambers. In 1918, Popenoe, the Army venereal disease specialist during World War I, co-wrote the widely used textbook, Applied Eugenics, which argued, "From an historical point of view, the first method which presents itself is execution… Its value in keeping up the standard of the race should not be underestimated." Applied Eugenics also devoted a chapter to "Lethal Selection," which operated "through the destruction of the individual by some adverse feature of the environment, such as excessive cold, or bacteria, or by bodily deficiency."
Eugenic breeders believed American society was not ready to implement an organized lethal solution. But many mental institutions and doctors practiced improvised medical lethality and passive euthanasia on their own. One institution in Lincoln, Illinois fed its incoming patients milk from tubercular cows believing a eugenically strong individual would be immune. Thirty to forty percent annual death rates resulted at Lincoln. Some doctors practiced passive eugenicide one newborn infant at a time. Others doctors at mental institutions engaged in lethal neglect.
Nonetheless, with eugenicide marginalized, the main solution for eugenicists was the rapid expansion of forced segregation and sterilization, as well as more marriage restrictions. California led the nation, performing nearly all sterilization procedures with little or no due process. In its first twenty-five years of eugenic legislation, California sterilized 9,782 individuals, mostly women. Many were classified as "bad girls," diagnosed as "passionate," "oversexed" or "sexually wayward." At Sonoma, some women were sterilized because of what was deemed an abnormally large clitoris or labia.
In 1933 alone, at least 1,278 coercive sterilizations were performed, 700 of which were on women. The state's two leading sterilization mills in 1933 were Sonoma State Home with 388 operations and Patton State Hospital with 363 operations. Other sterilization centers included Agnews, Mendocino, Napa, Norwalk, Stockton and Pacific Colony state hospitals.
Even the United States Supreme Court endorsed aspects of eugenics. In its infamous 1927 decision, Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes wrote, "It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." This decision opened the floodgates for thousands to be coercively sterilized or otherwise persecuted as subhuman. Years later, the Nazis at the Nuremberg trials quoted Holmes's words in their own defense.
Only after eugenics became entrenched in the United States was the campaign transplanted into Germany, in no small measure through the efforts of California eugenicists, who published booklets idealizing sterilization and circulated them to German official and scientists.
Hitler studied American eugenics laws. He tried to legitimize his anti-Semitism by medicalizing it, and wrapping it in the more palatable pseudoscientific facade of eugenics. Hitler was able to recruit more followers among reasonable Germans by claiming that science was on his side. While Hitler's race hatred sprung from his own mind, the intellectual outlines of the eugenics Hitler adopted in 1924 were made in America.
During the '20s, Carnegie Institution eugenic scientists cultivated deep personal and professional relationships with Germany's fascist eugenicists. In Mein Kampf, published in 1924, Hitler quoted American eugenic ideology and openly displayed a thorough knowledge of American eugenics. "There is today one state," wrote Hitler, "in which at least weak beginnings toward a better conception [of immigration] are noticeable. Of course, it is not our model German Republic, but the United States."
Hitler proudly told his comrades just how closely he followed the progress of the American eugenics movement. "I have studied with great interest," he told a fellow Nazi, "the laws of several American states concerning prevention of reproduction by people whose progeny would, in all probability, be of no value or be injurious to the racial stock."
Hitler even wrote a fan letter to American eugenic leader Madison Grant calling his race-based eugenics book, The Passing of the Great Race his "bible."
Hitler's struggle for a superior race would be a mad crusade for a Master Race. Now, the American term "Nordic" was freely exchanged with "Germanic" or "Aryan." Race science, racial purity and racial dominance became the driving force behind Hitler's Nazism. Nazi eugenics would ultimately dictate who would be persecuted in a Reich-dominated Europe, how people would live, and how they would die. Nazi doctors would become the unseen generals in Hitler's war against the Jews and other Europeans deemed inferior. Doctors would create the science, devise the eugenic formulas, and even hand-select the victims for sterilization, euthanasia and mass extermination.
During the Reich's early years, eugenicists across America welcomed Hitler's plans as the logical fulfillment of their own decades of research and effort. California eugenicists republished Nazi propaganda for American consumption. They also arranged for Nazi scientific exhibits, such as an August 1934 display at the L.A. County Museum, for the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association.
In 1934, as Germany's sterilizations were accelerating beyond 5,000 per month, the California eugenics leader C. M. Goethe upon returning from Germany ebulliently bragged to a key colleague, "You will be interested to know, that your work has played a powerful part in shaping the opinions of the group of intellectuals who are behind Hitler in this epoch-making program. Everywhere I sensed that their opinions have been tremendously stimulated by American thought.…I want you, my dear friend, to carry this thought with you for the rest of your life, that you have really jolted into action a great government of 60 million people."
That same year, ten years, after Virginia passed its sterilization act, Joseph DeJarnette, superintendent of Virginia's Western State Hospital, observed in the Richmond Times-Dispatch, "The Germans are beating us at our own game."
More than just providing the scientific roadmap, America funded Germany's eugenic institutions. By 1926, Rockefeller had donated some $410,000 -- almost $4 million in 21st-Century money -- to hundreds of German researchers. In May 1926, Rockefeller awarded $250,000 to the German Psychiatric Institute of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, later to become the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry. Among the leading psychiatrists at the German Psychiatric Institute was Ernst Rüdin, who became director and eventually an architect of Hitler's systematic medical repression.
Another in the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute's eugenic complex of institutions was the Institute for Brain Research. Since 1915, it had operated out of a single room. Everything changed when Rockefeller money arrived in 1929. A grant of $317,000 allowed the Institute to construct a major building and take center stage in German race biology. The Institute received additional grants from the Rockefeller Foundation during the next several years. Leading the Institute, once again, was Hitler's medical henchman Ernst Rüdin. Rüdin's organization became a prime director and recipient of the murderous experimentation and research conducted on Jews, Gypsies and others.
Beginning in 1940, thousands of Germans taken from old age homes, mental institutions and other custodial facilities were systematically gassed. Between 50,000 and 100,000 were eventually killed.
Leon Whitney, executive secretary of the American Eugenics Society declared of Nazism, "While we were pussy-footing around…the Germans were calling a spade a spade."
A special recipient of Rockefeller funding was the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics in Berlin. For decades, American eugenicists had craved twins to advance their research into heredity. The Institute was now prepared to undertake such research on an unprecedented level. On May 13, 1932, the Rockefeller Foundation in New York dispatched a radiogram to its Paris office: JUNE MEETING EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE NINE THOUSAND DOLLARS OVER THREE YEAR PERIOD TO KWG INSTITUTE ANTHROPOLOGY FOR RESEARCH ON TWINS AND EFFECTS ON LATER GENERATIONS OF SUBSTANCES TOXIC FOR GERM PLASM.
At the time of Rockefeller's endowment, Otmar Freiherr von Verschuer, a hero in American eugenics circles, functioned as a head of the Institute for Anthropology, Human Heredity and Eugenics. Rockefeller funding of that Institute continued both directly and through other research conduits during Verschuer's early tenure. In 1935, Verschuer left the Institute to form a rival eugenics facility in Frankfurt that was much heralded in the American eugenic press. Research on twins in the Third Reich exploded, backed up by government decrees. Verschuer wrote in Der Erbarzt, a eugenic doctor's journal he edited, that Germany's war would yield a "total solution to the Jewish problem."
Verschuer had a long-time assistant. His name was Josef Mengele. On May 30, 1943, Mengele arrived at Auschwitz. Verschuer notified the German Research Society, "My assistant, Dr. Josef Mengele (M.D., Ph.D.) joined me in this branch of research. He is presently employed as Hauptsturmführer [captain] and camp physician in the Auschwitz concentration camp. Anthropological testing of the most diverse racial groups in this concentration camp is being carried out with permission of the SS Reichsführer [Himmler]."
Mengele began searching the boxcar arrivals for twins. When he found them, he performed beastly experiments, scrupulously wrote up the reports and sent the paperwork back to Verschuer's institute for evaluation. Often, cadavers, eyes and other body parts were also dispatched to Berlin's eugenic institutes.
Rockefeller executives never knew of Mengele. With few exceptions, the foundation had ceased all eugenic studies in Nazi-occupied Europe before the war erupted in 1939. But by that time the die had been cast. The talented men Rockefeller and Carnegie financed, the institutions they helped found, and the science it helped create took on a scientific momentum of their own.
After the war, eugenics was declared a crime against humanity--an act of genocide. Germans were tried and they cited the California statutes in their defense. To no avail. They were found guilty.
However, Mengele's boss Verschuer escaped prosecution. Verschuer re-established his connections with California eugenicists who had gone underground and renamed their crusade "human genetics." Typical was an exchange July 25, 1946 when Popenoe wrote Verschuer, "It was indeed a pleasure to hear from you again. I have been very anxious about my colleagues in Germany…. I suppose sterilization has been discontinued in Germany?" Popenoe offered tidbits about various American eugenic luminaries and then sent various eugenic publications. In a separate package, Popenoe sent some cocoa, coffee and other goodies.
Verschuer wrote back, "Your very friendly letter of 7/25 gave me a great deal of pleasure and you have my heartfelt thanks for it. The letter builds another bridge between your and my scientific work; I hope that this bridge will never again collapse but rather make possible valuable mutual enrichment and stimulation."
Soon, Verschuer once again became a respected scientist in Germany and around the world. In 1949, he became a corresponding member of the newly formed American Society of Human Genetics, organized by American eugenicists and geneticists.
In the fall of 1950, the University of Münster offered Verschuer a position at its new Institute of Human Genetics, where he later became a dean. In the early and mid-1950s, Verschuer became an honorary member of numerous prestigious societies, including the Italian Society of Genetics, the Anthropological Society of Vienna, and the Japanese Society for Human Genetics.
Human genetics' genocidal roots in eugenics were ignored by a victorious generation that refused to link itself to the crimes of Nazism and by succeeding generations that never knew the truth of the years leading up to war. Now governors of five states, including California have issued public apologies to their citizens, past and present, for sterilization and other abuses spawned by the eugenics movement.
Human genetics became an enlightened endeavor in the late twentieth century. Hard-working, devoted scientists finally cracked the human code through the Human Genome Project. Now, every individual can be biologically identified and classified by trait and ancestry. Yet even now, some leading voices in the genetic world are calling for a cleansing of the unwanted among us, and even a master human species.
There is understandable wariness about more ordinary forms of abuse, for example, in denying insurance or employment based on genetic tests. On October 14, America's first genetic anti-discrimination legislation passed the Senate by unanimous vote. Yet because genetics research is global, no single nation's law can stop the threats
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Lightsheer Diode For Sale
Drugs and Peruvian Army - Wikileaks original
Formularende
ID: 196642
Date: 2009-03-12 21:57:00
Origin: 09LIMA345
Source: Embassy Lima
Classification: SECRET//NOFORN
Dunno: 09LIMA1640 09LIMA1865
Destination: VZCZCXYZ0002
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHPE #0345/01 0712157
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 122157Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY LIMA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0184
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION PRIORITY 2218
S E C R E T LIMA 000345
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/13/2034
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PINR, PTER, SNAR, KCRM, PE
SUBJECT: ALLEGED ARMY CORRUPTION -- A PERSPECTIVE
REF: A. LIMA 1865
B. IIR 6 876 0037 08
C. LIMA 1640
D. IIR 6 876 0018 09
Classified By: Amb. P. Michael McKinley. Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (S/NF) Introduction and Summary: The Garcia Administration's efforts to combat narcotrafficking have been stronger than under past administrations, and have included a National Anti-Drug Strategy partly supported with government funds, solid progress combatting coca production in the Upper Huallaga Valley, and better police cooperation. And while corruption has long plagued Peruvian government institutions, few observers believe the problem today is anywhere near as deep or extensive as during the shadowy (1990-2000) reign of former President Fujimori's intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos.
xxxxxxxxxxxx has claimed to Poloffs that remnants of the Montesinos narco-corruption web still exist within the military. xxxxxxxxxxxx argues that some senior military officials receive lucrative payoffs from drug traffickers operating in the Apurimac and Ene River Valley (VRAE), which is also the base of one of the most important remnants of the Shining Path guerrillas. xxxxxxxxxxxx contends that the army – for fear of disrupting these drug trafficking networks and losing access to payoffs -- is unwilling to commit the large force needed to pacify the VRAE. As a result, xxxxxxxxxxx argues, ongoing military operations against the Shining Path are destined to fall short. Some of xxxxxxxxxxx accusations are corroborated by other Embassy contacts, press reports, and internal documents as well as circumstantial evidence. Although the xxxxxxxxxxxx clearly has an axe to grind against xxxxxxxxxxxx, the evidence calls for close monitoring. In the meantime, it is apparent that Defense Minister Antero Flores Araoz is continuing to push the military to build on and expand new counter-terrorism efforts in the VRAE. (Note: This cable focuses on military, rather than police corruption because the military retains principal authority in the VRAE.
The military's recent operations against the Shining Path in the VRAE are discussed Septel. End Note.) End Introduction and Summary.
Army Command Dismantles Military Operations in the VRAE (2004)
--------------------------------------------- ------------
2. (S/NF) Corruption has long plagued Peruvian government institutions, including the security services -- military, police and judicial. Former President Alberto Fujimori's (1990-2000) intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos, for example, collaborated with top army and other security officials to develop a web of protection for favored drug traffickers while cooperating with U.S. officials to combat others. To many observers, that was Peru's "heyday" of narco-corruption -- a time when the government of Peru verged on becoming a kind of "narco-state" in which those who controlled the main criminal trafficking networks were in fact high government officials. While most observers acknowledge that Peru has come a long way since that time, sharply reducing the extent of such subterranean influences, few believe that drug-related corruption has been eliminated and some believe it may now again be on the rise.
xxxxxxxxxxx argues that significant elements of this corrupt network continue to exist and to operate -- now under the control of second-tier officers from the Montesinos period.
(S/NF) Many of xxxxxxxxxx principle accusations stem from corruption xxxxxxxxxx says xxxxxxxxxxx witnessed xxxxxxxxxx in Ayacucho (which includes part of the VRAE). At that time xxxxxxxxxx launched a counter-insurgency operation that xxxxxxxxxx claimed some senior army officers later dismantled when it threatened their own corrupt interests. xxxxxxxxxx used a small salary increase approved by then-President Alejandro Toledo to recruit auxiliary troops from local self-defense groups in the VRAE to build xxxxxxxxxxxx forces from 300 to 3,500 troops.
xxxxxxxxxx deployed these troops to small bases of about 100 soldiers each, spread throughout the VRAE in Ayacucho.
xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloff xxxxxxxxxxx such bases would be better positioned to resist insurgents and drug traffickers than the isolated outposts of five to seven soldiers -- the model in use at the time -- who regularly accepted bribes rather than risk confronting superior forces. (A variety of articles and investigative news programs from 2004 confirmed this de scription xxxxxxxxxxxx.)
4. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx however, the army xxxxxxxxxxx dismantled xxxxxxxxxxx and reduced troop levels to 700. xxxxxxxxxxxx threatened lucrative sales of excess fuel by senior army officers to drug traffickers. xxxxxxxxxxxx
Excess Fuel Scandal Implicates Top Generals (2006)
--------------------------------------------- -----
5. (S/NF)xxxxxxxxxxx the excess military fuel scandal that erupted in 2006 is linked to the army's drug trafficking ties in the VRAE. The scandal broke when the press denounced a scheme by some senior generals to request hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel in 2006 for sale and personal enrichment. xxxxxxxxxxx that about half this fuel was sold to companies like Repsol, while the rest, in the form of kerosene, was sold to drug traffickers in the VRAE.
One prominent counter-narcotics analyst told Poloff he had seen evidence that the military had sold kerosene to drug traffickers in northern Peru, and -- although he did not have evidence -- believed it plausible they have also sold to traffickers in the VRAE. Prosecutors have since implicated dozens of Generals in the scheme to commercialize fuel, including then Army commander Cesar Reinoso -- who was forced to resign -- and his replacement Edwin Donayre. Reinoso later claimed that the scheme was nothing new and that nearly all senior generals participated. (Note: Officers are officially provided periodic fuel allotments, usually more than can be reasonably consumed, and consider this a perquisite that complements their base salary. End Note.)
Army Commanding General Donayre retired from the military on December 5 -- putatively for his politically inflammatory comments relating to Chile (Ref A) -- but in the view of some observers for other reasons as well, including his alleged involvement in the fuel skimming scheme. Xxxxxxxxxx
6. (S/NF) Peru's Public Ministry is currently investigating the fuel scandal, so far without results. In a series of recent articles published in the political weekly "Caretas," prominent investigative journalist Gustavo Gorriti has alleged an army cover-up. Gorriti reported that General Donayre declined to meet Public Ministry investigators on six separate occasions, and that he reassigned the army's internal inspector to a remote jungle posting after the inspector issued a damning report on the scandal. Gorriti also reported that the GOP's independent Comptroller in 2008 completed an investigation that said the military used clumsy counterfeit documentation to "justify" over $2 million in excess fuel. xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloffs that the army is withholding internal accounting documents that would help prove the investigators case. xxxxxxxxxxx gave Poloff what xxxxxxxxx said were copies of these documents, marked "Secret", that showed hundreds of thousands of gallons of "extraordinary fuel" allotments to various generals in 2004 and 2005.
Cocaine Exported Via Army Base in Northern Peru (2004)
---------------------------------------------
------
7. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloff he believed a drug trafficking operation uncovered by police in 2004 at an army base in Piura in northern Peru was also linked to some senior military officials and drugs exiting the VRAE. According to a series of investigative reports by a prominent newspaper, a junior officer gave traffickers linked to a Mexican cartel free rein to use the base and its military vehicles to transit cocaine shipments to a military port where the navy ran a fish-packing operation. At the port, the traffickers packed the drugs in with the fish for export. In the 2004 bust, police captured 700 kg of cocaine. The commander of the base at the time, General Williams Zapata -- now Peru's representative at the Inter-American Defense Board in Washington -- refused to comment beyond claiming that the military was not involved with drug trafficking.
xxxxxxxxxx however, told Poloff that the implicated junior officer as well as another perpetrator privately alleged that both General Zapata and another unnamed senior general had participated in the drug operation. (Note: Currently, the junior officer is detained in Brazil, awaiting possible extradition, and the other offender is in prison in Piura awaiting trial. End Note.)
8. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxx saw signs that officers may have continued to cooperate with drug traffickers. His main suspicion surrounded a visit to the base that year by the Director of the National Chamber of Fishing of Piura, Rolando Eugenio Velasco Heysen, to meet regional Army commander General Paul da Silva. Xxxxxxxxxx speculated that Da Silva and Velasco -- who was arrested in October 2007 for attempting to export 840 kilograms of cocaine hidden in frozen fish -- were coordinating drug shipments. An investigative journalist later reported that both Da Silva and General Edwin Donayre had met with Velasco, but that Velasco claimed he was merely promoting the consumption of high-protein squid by the army. Xxxxxxxxxxxxx claims this argument makes no sense because the Generals'meetings with Velasco occurred outside the time of year that the Army signs new contracts.
Counter-Drug Analysts on Possible Narco-Army Links
--------------------------------------------
9. (S/NF) A prominent Peruvian counter-drug analyst who travels regularly to the VRAE agreed with the assessment that some senior army commanders were complicit with drug trafficking. He further believed the military was beginning to recuperate the political power that it had in the 1990s under President Alberto Fujimori's spy chief Vladimiro
Montesinos, when senior military officers worked surreptitiously and closely with (certain) drug traffickers.
This analyst said that on his last trip to the VRAE, a local mayor told him the military controlled all the main riverine drug routes, and that officers charged protection money rather than staunch the flow. A second analyst who travels regularly to the VRAE said he had clear evidence that the military controlled at least one major drug route (through
Cayramayo) and charged bribes from passing drug traffickers.
10. (S/NF) The analysts also highlighted the case of a drug plane that crashed in October 2007 while trying to take off from a clandestine airstrip in VRAE. According to a report in the left-of-center newspaper La Republica, the airstrip was located in direct view of a military base. The paper's local sources said that no plane could take off or land without being spotted from the base. The first analyst said his sources in the area told him the army had actually built the airstrip. According to a DAO source, after the plane crashed, an army unit sought to destroy any evidence by cutting up the wreckage and dumping it in the river (Ref B).
The national police received a tip about the army's actions and recovered the plane, but did not report the incident in order to avoid inflaming already tense relations with the
military. Army sources told La Republica, however, that the plane was the first they had ever discovered in the area and that they immediately reported it to the police.
Implications for Military Operations in the VRAE
--------------------------------------------- ---
11. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx several analysts argued that the military are reluctant to implement a serious plan to pacify the VRAE because the payoffs from drug traffickers
are too profitable. These contacts dismissed the recent Operation Excellence in Vizcatan (Ref C and Septel) as too small to have any real impact in such a large and harsh terrain. The operation may temporarily displace Shining Path cells, they said, but it will not deter drug traffickers.
One analyst described the operation as a smokescreen designed to deflect increasing political pressure on the army to showresults. Another analyst argued that the operation appeared to be a serious effort to decapitate Shining Path while at the same time avoiding the disruption of profitable drug trafficking routes.
xxxxxxxxxxx
Comment: A Series of Worrying Indicators
----------------------------------------
12. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxx the limited and tentative progress by the military in the VRAE to date does give some plausibility to xxxxxxxxxx argument that the some army officials may not support the larger objectives of the ongoing operations in the VRAE. We will continue to closely monitor evidence of drug corruption in the military and to encourage the government to consolidate and expand on the first steps taken during Operation Excellence.
MCKINLEY
Formularende
ID: 196642
Date: 2009-03-12 21:57:00
Origin: 09LIMA345
Source: Embassy Lima
Classification: SECRET//NOFORN
Dunno: 09LIMA1640 09LIMA1865
Destination: VZCZCXYZ0002
PP RUEHWEB
DE RUEHPE #0345/01 0712157
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
P 122157Z MAR 09
FM AMEMBASSY LIMA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 0184
INFO RUEHAC/AMEMBASSY ASUNCION PRIORITY 2218
S E C R E T LIMA 000345
NOFORN
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: DECL: 03/13/2034
TAGS: PGOV, PREL, PINR, PTER, SNAR, KCRM, PE
SUBJECT: ALLEGED ARMY CORRUPTION -- A PERSPECTIVE
REF: A. LIMA 1865
B. IIR 6 876 0037 08
C. LIMA 1640
D. IIR 6 876 0018 09
Classified By: Amb. P. Michael McKinley. Reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
1. (S/NF) Introduction and Summary: The Garcia Administration's efforts to combat narcotrafficking have been stronger than under past administrations, and have included a National Anti-Drug Strategy partly supported with government funds, solid progress combatting coca production in the Upper Huallaga Valley, and better police cooperation. And while corruption has long plagued Peruvian government institutions, few observers believe the problem today is anywhere near as deep or extensive as during the shadowy (1990-2000) reign of former President Fujimori's intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos.
xxxxxxxxxxxx has claimed to Poloffs that remnants of the Montesinos narco-corruption web still exist within the military. xxxxxxxxxxxx argues that some senior military officials receive lucrative payoffs from drug traffickers operating in the Apurimac and Ene River Valley (VRAE), which is also the base of one of the most important remnants of the Shining Path guerrillas. xxxxxxxxxxxx contends that the army – for fear of disrupting these drug trafficking networks and losing access to payoffs -- is unwilling to commit the large force needed to pacify the VRAE. As a result, xxxxxxxxxxx argues, ongoing military operations against the Shining Path are destined to fall short. Some of xxxxxxxxxxx accusations are corroborated by other Embassy contacts, press reports, and internal documents as well as circumstantial evidence. Although the xxxxxxxxxxxx clearly has an axe to grind against xxxxxxxxxxxx, the evidence calls for close monitoring. In the meantime, it is apparent that Defense Minister Antero Flores Araoz is continuing to push the military to build on and expand new counter-terrorism efforts in the VRAE. (Note: This cable focuses on military, rather than police corruption because the military retains principal authority in the VRAE.
The military's recent operations against the Shining Path in the VRAE are discussed Septel. End Note.) End Introduction and Summary.
Army Command Dismantles Military Operations in the VRAE (2004)
--------------------------------------------- ------------
2. (S/NF) Corruption has long plagued Peruvian government institutions, including the security services -- military, police and judicial. Former President Alberto Fujimori's (1990-2000) intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos, for example, collaborated with top army and other security officials to develop a web of protection for favored drug traffickers while cooperating with U.S. officials to combat others. To many observers, that was Peru's "heyday" of narco-corruption -- a time when the government of Peru verged on becoming a kind of "narco-state" in which those who controlled the main criminal trafficking networks were in fact high government officials. While most observers acknowledge that Peru has come a long way since that time, sharply reducing the extent of such subterranean influences, few believe that drug-related corruption has been eliminated and some believe it may now again be on the rise.
xxxxxxxxxxx argues that significant elements of this corrupt network continue to exist and to operate -- now under the control of second-tier officers from the Montesinos period.
(S/NF) Many of xxxxxxxxxx principle accusations stem from corruption xxxxxxxxxx says xxxxxxxxxxx witnessed xxxxxxxxxx in Ayacucho (which includes part of the VRAE). At that time xxxxxxxxxx launched a counter-insurgency operation that xxxxxxxxxx claimed some senior army officers later dismantled when it threatened their own corrupt interests. xxxxxxxxxx used a small salary increase approved by then-President Alejandro Toledo to recruit auxiliary troops from local self-defense groups in the VRAE to build xxxxxxxxxxxx forces from 300 to 3,500 troops.
xxxxxxxxxx deployed these troops to small bases of about 100 soldiers each, spread throughout the VRAE in Ayacucho.
xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloff xxxxxxxxxxx such bases would be better positioned to resist insurgents and drug traffickers than the isolated outposts of five to seven soldiers -- the model in use at the time -- who regularly accepted bribes rather than risk confronting superior forces. (A variety of articles and investigative news programs from 2004 confirmed this de scription xxxxxxxxxxxx.)
4. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx however, the army xxxxxxxxxxx dismantled xxxxxxxxxxx and reduced troop levels to 700. xxxxxxxxxxxx threatened lucrative sales of excess fuel by senior army officers to drug traffickers. xxxxxxxxxxxx
Excess Fuel Scandal Implicates Top Generals (2006)
--------------------------------------------- -----
5. (S/NF)xxxxxxxxxxx the excess military fuel scandal that erupted in 2006 is linked to the army's drug trafficking ties in the VRAE. The scandal broke when the press denounced a scheme by some senior generals to request hundreds of thousands of gallons of fuel in 2006 for sale and personal enrichment. xxxxxxxxxxx that about half this fuel was sold to companies like Repsol, while the rest, in the form of kerosene, was sold to drug traffickers in the VRAE.
One prominent counter-narcotics analyst told Poloff he had seen evidence that the military had sold kerosene to drug traffickers in northern Peru, and -- although he did not have evidence -- believed it plausible they have also sold to traffickers in the VRAE. Prosecutors have since implicated dozens of Generals in the scheme to commercialize fuel, including then Army commander Cesar Reinoso -- who was forced to resign -- and his replacement Edwin Donayre. Reinoso later claimed that the scheme was nothing new and that nearly all senior generals participated. (Note: Officers are officially provided periodic fuel allotments, usually more than can be reasonably consumed, and consider this a perquisite that complements their base salary. End Note.)
Army Commanding General Donayre retired from the military on December 5 -- putatively for his politically inflammatory comments relating to Chile (Ref A) -- but in the view of some observers for other reasons as well, including his alleged involvement in the fuel skimming scheme. Xxxxxxxxxx
6. (S/NF) Peru's Public Ministry is currently investigating the fuel scandal, so far without results. In a series of recent articles published in the political weekly "Caretas," prominent investigative journalist Gustavo Gorriti has alleged an army cover-up. Gorriti reported that General Donayre declined to meet Public Ministry investigators on six separate occasions, and that he reassigned the army's internal inspector to a remote jungle posting after the inspector issued a damning report on the scandal. Gorriti also reported that the GOP's independent Comptroller in 2008 completed an investigation that said the military used clumsy counterfeit documentation to "justify" over $2 million in excess fuel. xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloffs that the army is withholding internal accounting documents that would help prove the investigators case. xxxxxxxxxxx gave Poloff what xxxxxxxxx said were copies of these documents, marked "Secret", that showed hundreds of thousands of gallons of "extraordinary fuel" allotments to various generals in 2004 and 2005.
Cocaine Exported Via Army Base in Northern Peru (2004)
---------------------------------------------
------
7. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx told Poloff he believed a drug trafficking operation uncovered by police in 2004 at an army base in Piura in northern Peru was also linked to some senior military officials and drugs exiting the VRAE. According to a series of investigative reports by a prominent newspaper, a junior officer gave traffickers linked to a Mexican cartel free rein to use the base and its military vehicles to transit cocaine shipments to a military port where the navy ran a fish-packing operation. At the port, the traffickers packed the drugs in with the fish for export. In the 2004 bust, police captured 700 kg of cocaine. The commander of the base at the time, General Williams Zapata -- now Peru's representative at the Inter-American Defense Board in Washington -- refused to comment beyond claiming that the military was not involved with drug trafficking.
xxxxxxxxxx however, told Poloff that the implicated junior officer as well as another perpetrator privately alleged that both General Zapata and another unnamed senior general had participated in the drug operation. (Note: Currently, the junior officer is detained in Brazil, awaiting possible extradition, and the other offender is in prison in Piura awaiting trial. End Note.)
8. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxx saw signs that officers may have continued to cooperate with drug traffickers. His main suspicion surrounded a visit to the base that year by the Director of the National Chamber of Fishing of Piura, Rolando Eugenio Velasco Heysen, to meet regional Army commander General Paul da Silva. Xxxxxxxxxx speculated that Da Silva and Velasco -- who was arrested in October 2007 for attempting to export 840 kilograms of cocaine hidden in frozen fish -- were coordinating drug shipments. An investigative journalist later reported that both Da Silva and General Edwin Donayre had met with Velasco, but that Velasco claimed he was merely promoting the consumption of high-protein squid by the army. Xxxxxxxxxxxxx claims this argument makes no sense because the Generals'meetings with Velasco occurred outside the time of year that the Army signs new contracts.
Counter-Drug Analysts on Possible Narco-Army Links
--------------------------------------------
9. (S/NF) A prominent Peruvian counter-drug analyst who travels regularly to the VRAE agreed with the assessment that some senior army commanders were complicit with drug trafficking. He further believed the military was beginning to recuperate the political power that it had in the 1990s under President Alberto Fujimori's spy chief Vladimiro
Montesinos, when senior military officers worked surreptitiously and closely with (certain) drug traffickers.
This analyst said that on his last trip to the VRAE, a local mayor told him the military controlled all the main riverine drug routes, and that officers charged protection money rather than staunch the flow. A second analyst who travels regularly to the VRAE said he had clear evidence that the military controlled at least one major drug route (through
Cayramayo) and charged bribes from passing drug traffickers.
10. (S/NF) The analysts also highlighted the case of a drug plane that crashed in October 2007 while trying to take off from a clandestine airstrip in VRAE. According to a report in the left-of-center newspaper La Republica, the airstrip was located in direct view of a military base. The paper's local sources said that no plane could take off or land without being spotted from the base. The first analyst said his sources in the area told him the army had actually built the airstrip. According to a DAO source, after the plane crashed, an army unit sought to destroy any evidence by cutting up the wreckage and dumping it in the river (Ref B).
The national police received a tip about the army's actions and recovered the plane, but did not report the incident in order to avoid inflaming already tense relations with the
military. Army sources told La Republica, however, that the plane was the first they had ever discovered in the area and that they immediately reported it to the police.
Implications for Military Operations in the VRAE
--------------------------------------------- ---
11. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxxx several analysts argued that the military are reluctant to implement a serious plan to pacify the VRAE because the payoffs from drug traffickers
are too profitable. These contacts dismissed the recent Operation Excellence in Vizcatan (Ref C and Septel) as too small to have any real impact in such a large and harsh terrain. The operation may temporarily displace Shining Path cells, they said, but it will not deter drug traffickers.
One analyst described the operation as a smokescreen designed to deflect increasing political pressure on the army to showresults. Another analyst argued that the operation appeared to be a serious effort to decapitate Shining Path while at the same time avoiding the disruption of profitable drug trafficking routes.
xxxxxxxxxxx
Comment: A Series of Worrying Indicators
----------------------------------------
12. (S/NF) xxxxxxxxxx the limited and tentative progress by the military in the VRAE to date does give some plausibility to xxxxxxxxxx argument that the some army officials may not support the larger objectives of the ongoing operations in the VRAE. We will continue to closely monitor evidence of drug corruption in the military and to encourage the government to consolidate and expand on the first steps taken during Operation Excellence.
MCKINLEY
Little Хххх Tееns Kid
Wikileaks Paraguay
Monday, 24 March 2008, 18:30
S E C R E T STATE 030340
SIPDIS
NOFORN
EO 12958 DECL: 02/27/2033
TAGS PINR, KPRP, ECON, PREL, PGOV, ETRD, PA
SUBJECT: (S) REPORTING AND COLLECTION NEEDS: PARAGUAY
REF: 07 STATE 161706
Classified By: PAULA CAUSEY, DAS, INR. REASON: 1.4(C).
1. (S/NF) This cable reports the results of a recent Washington review of reporting and collection needs for Paraguay. The review produced a list of priorities (paragraph 5) intended to guide participating USG agencies as they allocate resources and update plans to collect information on Paraguay. The priorities also serve as a useful tool to help the Embassy manage reporting and collection, including formulation of Mission Strategic Plans (MSPs).
2. (S/NF) Important information often is available to non-State members of the Country Team whose agencies participated in the review of this National HUMINT Collection Directive. COMs, DCMs, and State reporting officers can assist by coordinating with other Country Team members to encourage relevant reporting through their own or State Department channels. 3. (S/NF) Please note that the community relies on State reporting officers for much of the biographical information collected worldwide. Informal biographic reporting by email and other means is vital to this effort. When it is available, reporting officers should include as much of the following information as possible: office and organizational titles; names, position titles and other information on business cards; numbers of telephones, cell phones, pagers and faxes; compendia of contact information, such as telephone directories (in compact disc or electronic format if available) and e-mail listings; internet and intranet “handles”, internet e-mail addresses, web site identification-URLs; credit card account numbers; frequent flyer account numbers; work schedules, and other relevant biographical information.
4. (S/NF) This National HUMINT Collection Directive (NHCD) is compliant with the National Intelligence Priorities Framework (NIPF), which was established in response to NSPD-26 of February 24, 2003. If needed, GRPO can provide further background on the NIPF and the use of NIPF abbreviations (shown in parentheses following each sub-issue below) in NHCDs.
5. (S/NF) Priority issues and issues outline:
A. Terrorism and Crime 1) Terrorist Threats and Activities (TERR-2) 2) Government Counterterrorist Response (TERR-2) 3) Impact of Corruption and Government Response (CRIM-3) 4) Narcotics Trafficking and Government Response (DRUG-3) 5) Money Laundering (MONY-3)
B. Political Dynamics and Democratization 1) Political Stability (DEPS-3) 2) Democratic Practice and the Rule of Law (DEPS-3) 3) Foreign Relations (FPOL-4) 4) Human Rights (HRWC-5)
C. Economy, Trade, and Investment 1) Economic Policies and Performance (ECFS-3) 2) Trade (TRAD-4) 3) Foreign Investment (TRAD-4)
D. Military and Security Issues 1) Critical Infrastructure Protection (INFR-4) 2) Military Structure and Capabilities (FMCC-4) 3) GRPO can provide text of this issue. 4) Health and Medical Developments (HLTH-4)
E. Information Infrastructure and Telecommunications (INFR-4)
6. (S/NF) Reporting and collection needs:
A. Terrorism and Crime
1) Terrorist Threats and Activities (TERR-2) – Information on the presence, intentions, plans and activities of terrorist groups, facilitators, and support networks – including, but not limited to, Hizballah, Hamas, al-Gama’at al-Islamiya, al-Qa’ida, jihadist media organizations, Iranian state agents or surrogates – in Paraguay, in particular in the Tri-Border Area (TBA). – Indications or evidence of terrorists’ or terrorist support networks’ involvement with narcotrafficking, money laundering, human smuggling, and/or other criminal activities as a means of obtaining funding or other logistical support; details on companies or organizations linked to terrorists or terrorist activity, to include financial transactions, shipping records, addresses, and associated companies/organizations. – Terrorist or terrorist support network plans and activities in the areas of recruitment, training, support, communications networks, local and regional command and control. – The arrival or expansion of Islamic NGOs or leaders with known or suspected radical affiliations. – Ties between and among terrorist organizations; evidence of terrorist links to government-including local/regional-officials, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (such as Jama’at al-Tabligh, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, and the Muslim World League), front organizations (including companies providing logistical or financial support), and organized criminal groups. – Identities information of terrorist members to include fingerprints, arrest photos, DNA, and iris scans. – Modus Operandi of individuals and terrorist groups, their use and/or modification of passports, seals/caches, and travel documents. – Plans, intentions, and activities of domestic terrorist groups and regional terrorist groups that operate in Paraguay.
2) Government Counterterrorist Response (TERR-2) – Information on the government’s policy, plans and intentions for addressing the terrorist threat, including support for or opposition to the United States in the war against terrorism; Paraguay’s position in regional and international fora, including support for or objection to U.S. counterterrorism policies. – Security services’ capabilities, at the national and local levels, to counter terrorist groups and their activities; government plans or intentions to further develop or expand those capabilities. – Details of police and security services’ efforts and programs to identify, monitor, and disrupt terrorist activities throughout Paraguay, and particularly in the TBA. – Government plans and efforts to deploy biometric systems. – Willingness to cooperate with the U.S. Government and other governments on counterterrorism issues, including the sharing of terrorist data; challenges (political, economic, financial, or personal) the government or government officials face which may influence their cooperation. – The status of, and prospects for, counterterrorism-related legislation.
3) Impact of Corruption and Government Response (CRIM-3) – Details about organized crime groups, including leadership, links to government or foreign entities, drug and human trafficking and smuggling, kidnapping, counterfeiting, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, connections to other international organized crime or terrorist groups, movement of organized crime into legitimate business structures, their locations, support structures and means of coordinating operations, with particular emphasis on their efforts to influence, suborn or corrupt government, law enforcement or security officials. – Information on the involvement of government, military, or security services personnel in corrupt practices, including officials involved in narcotrafficking and arms smuggling, trafficking in persons, funds diversion, influence peddling, bribe solicitation, blackmail, fraud–especially of travel documents–and nepotism; the impact of government corruption on efforts to pursue, capture, and prosecute terrorists and the effect on popular confidence in the government. – Details of corruption in government offices, particularly in the attorney general’s office, the judiciary, and the customs service; status of any government efforts to combat corruption. – National, regional, or international criminal activity, including economic distortions caused by criminal activity; the government’s efforts to devise and implement plans and policies to combat criminal activity; the level of cooperation with foreign security services on detecting, monitoring, and intercepting illicit arms and other smuggled goods.
4) Narcotics Trafficking and Government Response (DRUG-3) – Details of narcotics trafficking and associated criminal activities, particularly in the TBA and other border regions; illicit drug shipments and trafficking nodes, modalities, and routes. – Details on drug trafficking organizations, including leadership (biographic information and biometric data), communications (types and sources of technologies used), and methods of operation, to include processing and storage sites, methods of laundering money, and activities of front companies (financial activities, shipping records, addresses, and associated companies). – Traffickers’ subversion or coercion of political, economic and judicial officials and systems, including attempts to gain influence through campaign contributions; impact of corruption from drug traffickers on executive offices, legislatures, military and security organizations. – Connections between narcotics traffickers and international organized criminal or terrorist groups. – Government control and enforcement plans, organizations, capabilities, and activities; military and police roles in combating drug trafficking or contributing to the trafficking. – Government plans and efforts to interdict the movement of narcotics through the TBA and elsewhere. – Details of legislative initiatives to improve counternarcotics enforcement and prosecutions.
5) Money Laundering (MONY-3) – Evidence of international organized crime, terrorist networks, drug producers, people smugglers, arms traffickers, government officials, military, and security services involvement in money laundering. – Details on the methods used to conduct illicit financial transactions. – Identification of financial organizations and businesses (names of personnel and physical location/address of entities), including exchange houses and informal mechanisms such as hawalas, involved in money laundering, the means employed, and the amounts and frequency of activity. – Government willingness and ability to enforce current law, investigate, and prosecute money laundering and illegal financial activities, to include plans to tighten financial controls and strengthen its financial intelligence unit. – Information about the underground market for treasury notes, bearer bonds, and other financial instruments.
B. Political Dynamics and Democratization
1) Political Stability (DEPS-3) – Plans and intentions of the government and ruling party to prepare for, or influence the outcome of, the April 2008 election. – Leading candidates and emerging leaders — to include their views of, and plans for relations with, the United States, Venezuela, Cuba, and other Latin American nations – especially for the 2008 election. – Political parties’ and candidates’ preparations for the 2008 election; electoral politics, party platforms, tactics, and strategies employed in the run-up to the election and plans for the post-election period. – Information-before and after the election-on governing and opposition parties’ alliances, rifts, internal factions, and constituencies, including key people, tactics, and strengths. – Details of post-election internal politics and political maneuvering during the transition from one administration to another. – Information on financial or material support to candidates, parties, or interest groups from foreign governments, especially from Cuba or Venezuela; post-electoral aid commitments from foreign governments. – Details of corrupt, illegal, or unethical activities aimed at subverting the electoral process. – Biographic and financial information on all leading contenders, and especially on Minister of Education Blanca Ovelar, former Vice President Castiglioni, Lino Oviedo, and Fernando Lugo; and biometric data, to include fingerprints, facial images, iris scans, and DNA, on these individuals.
2) Democratic Practice and the Rule of Law (DEPS-3) – Evidence of commitment, or lack of commitment, on the part of the government, political parties, or special interest groups to democratic principles, rule of law, transparent, corruption-free governance practices, and free and fair elections. – Details of political deal making and bargains and the resulting impact on popular confidence in the elections and the political process; indications of government or political party bargaining over the candidacy of Lino Oviedo and his campaign.
3) Foreign Relations (FPOL-4) – Information on the government’s foreign policy plans and intentions toward neighboring states, regional powers (including the United States), and key international actors. – Status of the government’s relations with and views of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his domestic and foreign policies and actions; the Paraguayan government perspective on Venezuelan efforts to influence Paraguay’s political process or leadership. – Information on Paraguay’s relationship with Cuba and the Paraguayan government perspective on Cuban activities and influence in Paraguay; Paraguay’s policy on Cuba in international and regional fora and the Paraguayan leadership’s views of the United States’ Cuba policy. – Student exchange programs and philanthropic activities in Paraguay sponsored by Cuba or Venezuela. – Paraguay’s relations with the MERCOSUR organization and its member countries in that multilateral environment. – Details of Paraguay’s position on U.S. policies and actions in the region and internationally, including Paraguay’s views on, and participation in, multilateral sanctions endorsed by the United States and/or the United Nations. – Information on key bilateral regional relationships, especially for Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. – Relations with Iran and information on Islamic facilities, including mosques, cultural centers, etc., supported by Iran. – Information on other key bilateral international relationships, especially for China, Taiwan, and Russia.
4) Human Rights (HRWC-5) – Government plans and intentions with regard to human rights issues, in particular willingness to crack down on – or disregard – violations by police, military or security services. – Performance of the police, military, and security services in upholding or violating human rights. – Government programs and efforts to prevent violence, trafficking in persons, prostitution, forced labor, slave labor, or vigilante activity.
C. Economy, Trade, and Investment
1) Economic Policies and Performance (ECFS-3) – Information on the state of the economy, the national budget, and internal and external debt; information on economic indicators, particularly for growth and inflation, including views of the government, political leaders, academics and other experts on Paraguay’s economy and its future prospects. – Details on government efforts to improve economic performance by developing and implementing policies on taxes, investment, labor, or other resources. – Details of the effects on the general population of economic developments and programs. – Impact on the economy of the discovery of potentially large gas and oil deposits in the Chaco region. – Government willingness and capability to fairly and equitably enforce the law on economic, financial, and banking issues and uncover/prevent illegal activities. – Paraguay’s interest and participation in the MCA Threshold Program.
2) Trade (TRAD-4) – Status of trade with Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and other countries in the region, including government positions on future opportunities, areas for expansion, and potential areas of conflict; the impact of MERCOSUR on Paraguay’s trade and the Paraguayan government’s assessment of its benefits, potential drawbacks, and future prospects. – Paraguay’s intentions with regard to ratifying Venezuela’s membership in MERCOSUR. – The Paraguayan government’s policies and positions related to trade with the United States; indications of genuine Paraguayan interest in negotiating a trade agreement with the United States; developments in Paraguay’s position on intellectual property rights legislation and enforcement. – Paraguayan plans and intentions to expand their requests for market access to the United States beyond their traditional commodities – beef, textiles, and sugar.
3) Foreign Investment (TRAD-4) – Government plans and intentions to attract additional foreign investment to Paraguay, including details of incentives and disincentives for foreign investment in Paraguay. – Government and business views on the impact of rising crime and concerns about the independence of the judiciary on foreign investment, and government plans to deal with these concerns. – Paraguay’s plans, policies, motives, and intended actions on intellectual property rights issues. – The Paraguayan government position on or participation in the Venezuelan initiative to create a regional development bank, the Bank of the South.
D. Military and Security Issues
1) Critical Infrastructure Protection (INFR-4) – Paraguay’s approach to critical infrastructure protection strategies and technologies; efforts to reduce the vulnerability of key systems, including energy (e.g., hydroelectric), telecommunications, and transportation. – Overtures to the United States and others for assistance in planning and implementing protective measures. – Legislation or executive actions undertaken to improve infrastructure security, especially the physical security of power generation and distribution systems.
2) Military Structure and Capabilities (FMCC-4) – Capabilities of the military, current and future, in light of recent decisions to downsize and re-organize; objectives and expectations for the budget and missions of this future force. – Evidence of denial and deception (D&D) programs, including: personnel, organizations, strategies, tactics, technologies, activity scheduling, or support by foreign countries; evidence of satellite tracking or a satellite warning program, especially any foreign involvement. – Capabilities, plans, and intentions for participation in international peacekeeping operations. – Intentions with respect to cooperation with U.S. military forces, including the potential for reinstatement of a Status of Forces Agreement. – Information on military cooperation, assistance received or provided, or interaction with others in the region, for example, the training provided by Argentina; status of international military cooperation or assistance programs, such as the kinds of military support that might be offered by China, Iran, Venezuela, Taiwan, or other countries. – Plans and intentions for weapons and equipment acquisitions, including details on suppliers. – Reactions to major arms acquisitions by countries in the region. – Paraguayan views on Venezuelan and Bolivian military actions and activities, in particular, Bolivian deployments near the border of Paraguay. – Indigenous R&D, production, repair, maintenance or upgrade of military material. – Details on joint cooperation or co-production arrangements. – Details on military command, control, communications, computer and intelligence (C4I) systems. – Biographic and financial information and biometric data on military leaders.
3) GRPO can provide text of this issue and related requirements.
4) Health and Medical Developments (HLTH-4) – Infectious disease outbreaks; national strategies for dealing with infectious disease, including detection and control. – Capabilities and quality of medical care in private, public, and military medical facilities. – Disaster planning and response capability. – Sources, locations and levels of environmental and chemical contamination of air, water, food, and soil that might affect health; content and location of toxic industrial chemical production and storage facilities.
E. Information Infrastructure and Telecommunications (INFR-4) – Details of telecommunications and information systems, networks, and technologies supporting Paraguayan national leadership, military, foreign intelligence and security services (FISS), and civil sector communications. – Define Paraguayan wireless infrastructure, cellular provider information, and makes/models of cellular phones and their operating systems. – Define Paraguayan satellite communications infrastructure, to include VSAT networks and use of point to point systems. – Information on communications practices of Paraguayan government and military leaders, key foreign officials in country (e.g., Cuban, Venezuelan, Bolivian, Iranian, or Chinese diplomats), and criminal entities or their surrogates, to include telephone and fax numbers and e-mail addresses, call activity (date, time, caller numbers, recipient numbers), phone books, cell phone numbers, telephone and fax user listings, internet protocol (IP) addresses, user accounts, and passwords. – Identify national and supranational telecommunications regulatory, administrative, and maintenance organizations. – Identify scope of Paraguayan telecommunications encryption efforts, details on the use of and efforts to acquire modern telecom technologies, regional and national telecommunications policies, programs and regulations. – Details on information repositories associated with RFID enabled systems increasingly used for passports, government badges, and transportation system RICE
Monday, 24 March 2008, 18:30
S E C R E T STATE 030340
SIPDIS
NOFORN
EO 12958 DECL: 02/27/2033
TAGS PINR, KPRP, ECON, PREL, PGOV, ETRD, PA
SUBJECT: (S) REPORTING AND COLLECTION NEEDS: PARAGUAY
REF: 07 STATE 161706
Classified By: PAULA CAUSEY, DAS, INR. REASON: 1.4(C).
1. (S/NF) This cable reports the results of a recent Washington review of reporting and collection needs for Paraguay. The review produced a list of priorities (paragraph 5) intended to guide participating USG agencies as they allocate resources and update plans to collect information on Paraguay. The priorities also serve as a useful tool to help the Embassy manage reporting and collection, including formulation of Mission Strategic Plans (MSPs).
2. (S/NF) Important information often is available to non-State members of the Country Team whose agencies participated in the review of this National HUMINT Collection Directive. COMs, DCMs, and State reporting officers can assist by coordinating with other Country Team members to encourage relevant reporting through their own or State Department channels. 3. (S/NF) Please note that the community relies on State reporting officers for much of the biographical information collected worldwide. Informal biographic reporting by email and other means is vital to this effort. When it is available, reporting officers should include as much of the following information as possible: office and organizational titles; names, position titles and other information on business cards; numbers of telephones, cell phones, pagers and faxes; compendia of contact information, such as telephone directories (in compact disc or electronic format if available) and e-mail listings; internet and intranet “handles”, internet e-mail addresses, web site identification-URLs; credit card account numbers; frequent flyer account numbers; work schedules, and other relevant biographical information.
4. (S/NF) This National HUMINT Collection Directive (NHCD) is compliant with the National Intelligence Priorities Framework (NIPF), which was established in response to NSPD-26 of February 24, 2003. If needed, GRPO can provide further background on the NIPF and the use of NIPF abbreviations (shown in parentheses following each sub-issue below) in NHCDs.
5. (S/NF) Priority issues and issues outline:
A. Terrorism and Crime 1) Terrorist Threats and Activities (TERR-2) 2) Government Counterterrorist Response (TERR-2) 3) Impact of Corruption and Government Response (CRIM-3) 4) Narcotics Trafficking and Government Response (DRUG-3) 5) Money Laundering (MONY-3)
B. Political Dynamics and Democratization 1) Political Stability (DEPS-3) 2) Democratic Practice and the Rule of Law (DEPS-3) 3) Foreign Relations (FPOL-4) 4) Human Rights (HRWC-5)
C. Economy, Trade, and Investment 1) Economic Policies and Performance (ECFS-3) 2) Trade (TRAD-4) 3) Foreign Investment (TRAD-4)
D. Military and Security Issues 1) Critical Infrastructure Protection (INFR-4) 2) Military Structure and Capabilities (FMCC-4) 3) GRPO can provide text of this issue. 4) Health and Medical Developments (HLTH-4)
E. Information Infrastructure and Telecommunications (INFR-4)
6. (S/NF) Reporting and collection needs:
A. Terrorism and Crime
1) Terrorist Threats and Activities (TERR-2) – Information on the presence, intentions, plans and activities of terrorist groups, facilitators, and support networks – including, but not limited to, Hizballah, Hamas, al-Gama’at al-Islamiya, al-Qa’ida, jihadist media organizations, Iranian state agents or surrogates – in Paraguay, in particular in the Tri-Border Area (TBA). – Indications or evidence of terrorists’ or terrorist support networks’ involvement with narcotrafficking, money laundering, human smuggling, and/or other criminal activities as a means of obtaining funding or other logistical support; details on companies or organizations linked to terrorists or terrorist activity, to include financial transactions, shipping records, addresses, and associated companies/organizations. – Terrorist or terrorist support network plans and activities in the areas of recruitment, training, support, communications networks, local and regional command and control. – The arrival or expansion of Islamic NGOs or leaders with known or suspected radical affiliations. – Ties between and among terrorist organizations; evidence of terrorist links to government-including local/regional-officials, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (such as Jama’at al-Tabligh, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, and the Muslim World League), front organizations (including companies providing logistical or financial support), and organized criminal groups. – Identities information of terrorist members to include fingerprints, arrest photos, DNA, and iris scans. – Modus Operandi of individuals and terrorist groups, their use and/or modification of passports, seals/caches, and travel documents. – Plans, intentions, and activities of domestic terrorist groups and regional terrorist groups that operate in Paraguay.
2) Government Counterterrorist Response (TERR-2) – Information on the government’s policy, plans and intentions for addressing the terrorist threat, including support for or opposition to the United States in the war against terrorism; Paraguay’s position in regional and international fora, including support for or objection to U.S. counterterrorism policies. – Security services’ capabilities, at the national and local levels, to counter terrorist groups and their activities; government plans or intentions to further develop or expand those capabilities. – Details of police and security services’ efforts and programs to identify, monitor, and disrupt terrorist activities throughout Paraguay, and particularly in the TBA. – Government plans and efforts to deploy biometric systems. – Willingness to cooperate with the U.S. Government and other governments on counterterrorism issues, including the sharing of terrorist data; challenges (political, economic, financial, or personal) the government or government officials face which may influence their cooperation. – The status of, and prospects for, counterterrorism-related legislation.
3) Impact of Corruption and Government Response (CRIM-3) – Details about organized crime groups, including leadership, links to government or foreign entities, drug and human trafficking and smuggling, kidnapping, counterfeiting, illicit arms trafficking, money laundering, connections to other international organized crime or terrorist groups, movement of organized crime into legitimate business structures, their locations, support structures and means of coordinating operations, with particular emphasis on their efforts to influence, suborn or corrupt government, law enforcement or security officials. – Information on the involvement of government, military, or security services personnel in corrupt practices, including officials involved in narcotrafficking and arms smuggling, trafficking in persons, funds diversion, influence peddling, bribe solicitation, blackmail, fraud–especially of travel documents–and nepotism; the impact of government corruption on efforts to pursue, capture, and prosecute terrorists and the effect on popular confidence in the government. – Details of corruption in government offices, particularly in the attorney general’s office, the judiciary, and the customs service; status of any government efforts to combat corruption. – National, regional, or international criminal activity, including economic distortions caused by criminal activity; the government’s efforts to devise and implement plans and policies to combat criminal activity; the level of cooperation with foreign security services on detecting, monitoring, and intercepting illicit arms and other smuggled goods.
4) Narcotics Trafficking and Government Response (DRUG-3) – Details of narcotics trafficking and associated criminal activities, particularly in the TBA and other border regions; illicit drug shipments and trafficking nodes, modalities, and routes. – Details on drug trafficking organizations, including leadership (biographic information and biometric data), communications (types and sources of technologies used), and methods of operation, to include processing and storage sites, methods of laundering money, and activities of front companies (financial activities, shipping records, addresses, and associated companies). – Traffickers’ subversion or coercion of political, economic and judicial officials and systems, including attempts to gain influence through campaign contributions; impact of corruption from drug traffickers on executive offices, legislatures, military and security organizations. – Connections between narcotics traffickers and international organized criminal or terrorist groups. – Government control and enforcement plans, organizations, capabilities, and activities; military and police roles in combating drug trafficking or contributing to the trafficking. – Government plans and efforts to interdict the movement of narcotics through the TBA and elsewhere. – Details of legislative initiatives to improve counternarcotics enforcement and prosecutions.
5) Money Laundering (MONY-3) – Evidence of international organized crime, terrorist networks, drug producers, people smugglers, arms traffickers, government officials, military, and security services involvement in money laundering. – Details on the methods used to conduct illicit financial transactions. – Identification of financial organizations and businesses (names of personnel and physical location/address of entities), including exchange houses and informal mechanisms such as hawalas, involved in money laundering, the means employed, and the amounts and frequency of activity. – Government willingness and ability to enforce current law, investigate, and prosecute money laundering and illegal financial activities, to include plans to tighten financial controls and strengthen its financial intelligence unit. – Information about the underground market for treasury notes, bearer bonds, and other financial instruments.
B. Political Dynamics and Democratization
1) Political Stability (DEPS-3) – Plans and intentions of the government and ruling party to prepare for, or influence the outcome of, the April 2008 election. – Leading candidates and emerging leaders — to include their views of, and plans for relations with, the United States, Venezuela, Cuba, and other Latin American nations – especially for the 2008 election. – Political parties’ and candidates’ preparations for the 2008 election; electoral politics, party platforms, tactics, and strategies employed in the run-up to the election and plans for the post-election period. – Information-before and after the election-on governing and opposition parties’ alliances, rifts, internal factions, and constituencies, including key people, tactics, and strengths. – Details of post-election internal politics and political maneuvering during the transition from one administration to another. – Information on financial or material support to candidates, parties, or interest groups from foreign governments, especially from Cuba or Venezuela; post-electoral aid commitments from foreign governments. – Details of corrupt, illegal, or unethical activities aimed at subverting the electoral process. – Biographic and financial information on all leading contenders, and especially on Minister of Education Blanca Ovelar, former Vice President Castiglioni, Lino Oviedo, and Fernando Lugo; and biometric data, to include fingerprints, facial images, iris scans, and DNA, on these individuals.
2) Democratic Practice and the Rule of Law (DEPS-3) – Evidence of commitment, or lack of commitment, on the part of the government, political parties, or special interest groups to democratic principles, rule of law, transparent, corruption-free governance practices, and free and fair elections. – Details of political deal making and bargains and the resulting impact on popular confidence in the elections and the political process; indications of government or political party bargaining over the candidacy of Lino Oviedo and his campaign.
3) Foreign Relations (FPOL-4) – Information on the government’s foreign policy plans and intentions toward neighboring states, regional powers (including the United States), and key international actors. – Status of the government’s relations with and views of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and his domestic and foreign policies and actions; the Paraguayan government perspective on Venezuelan efforts to influence Paraguay’s political process or leadership. – Information on Paraguay’s relationship with Cuba and the Paraguayan government perspective on Cuban activities and influence in Paraguay; Paraguay’s policy on Cuba in international and regional fora and the Paraguayan leadership’s views of the United States’ Cuba policy. – Student exchange programs and philanthropic activities in Paraguay sponsored by Cuba or Venezuela. – Paraguay’s relations with the MERCOSUR organization and its member countries in that multilateral environment. – Details of Paraguay’s position on U.S. policies and actions in the region and internationally, including Paraguay’s views on, and participation in, multilateral sanctions endorsed by the United States and/or the United Nations. – Information on key bilateral regional relationships, especially for Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Bolivia. – Relations with Iran and information on Islamic facilities, including mosques, cultural centers, etc., supported by Iran. – Information on other key bilateral international relationships, especially for China, Taiwan, and Russia.
4) Human Rights (HRWC-5) – Government plans and intentions with regard to human rights issues, in particular willingness to crack down on – or disregard – violations by police, military or security services. – Performance of the police, military, and security services in upholding or violating human rights. – Government programs and efforts to prevent violence, trafficking in persons, prostitution, forced labor, slave labor, or vigilante activity.
C. Economy, Trade, and Investment
1) Economic Policies and Performance (ECFS-3) – Information on the state of the economy, the national budget, and internal and external debt; information on economic indicators, particularly for growth and inflation, including views of the government, political leaders, academics and other experts on Paraguay’s economy and its future prospects. – Details on government efforts to improve economic performance by developing and implementing policies on taxes, investment, labor, or other resources. – Details of the effects on the general population of economic developments and programs. – Impact on the economy of the discovery of potentially large gas and oil deposits in the Chaco region. – Government willingness and capability to fairly and equitably enforce the law on economic, financial, and banking issues and uncover/prevent illegal activities. – Paraguay’s interest and participation in the MCA Threshold Program.
2) Trade (TRAD-4) – Status of trade with Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and other countries in the region, including government positions on future opportunities, areas for expansion, and potential areas of conflict; the impact of MERCOSUR on Paraguay’s trade and the Paraguayan government’s assessment of its benefits, potential drawbacks, and future prospects. – Paraguay’s intentions with regard to ratifying Venezuela’s membership in MERCOSUR. – The Paraguayan government’s policies and positions related to trade with the United States; indications of genuine Paraguayan interest in negotiating a trade agreement with the United States; developments in Paraguay’s position on intellectual property rights legislation and enforcement. – Paraguayan plans and intentions to expand their requests for market access to the United States beyond their traditional commodities – beef, textiles, and sugar.
3) Foreign Investment (TRAD-4) – Government plans and intentions to attract additional foreign investment to Paraguay, including details of incentives and disincentives for foreign investment in Paraguay. – Government and business views on the impact of rising crime and concerns about the independence of the judiciary on foreign investment, and government plans to deal with these concerns. – Paraguay’s plans, policies, motives, and intended actions on intellectual property rights issues. – The Paraguayan government position on or participation in the Venezuelan initiative to create a regional development bank, the Bank of the South.
D. Military and Security Issues
1) Critical Infrastructure Protection (INFR-4) – Paraguay’s approach to critical infrastructure protection strategies and technologies; efforts to reduce the vulnerability of key systems, including energy (e.g., hydroelectric), telecommunications, and transportation. – Overtures to the United States and others for assistance in planning and implementing protective measures. – Legislation or executive actions undertaken to improve infrastructure security, especially the physical security of power generation and distribution systems.
2) Military Structure and Capabilities (FMCC-4) – Capabilities of the military, current and future, in light of recent decisions to downsize and re-organize; objectives and expectations for the budget and missions of this future force. – Evidence of denial and deception (D&D) programs, including: personnel, organizations, strategies, tactics, technologies, activity scheduling, or support by foreign countries; evidence of satellite tracking or a satellite warning program, especially any foreign involvement. – Capabilities, plans, and intentions for participation in international peacekeeping operations. – Intentions with respect to cooperation with U.S. military forces, including the potential for reinstatement of a Status of Forces Agreement. – Information on military cooperation, assistance received or provided, or interaction with others in the region, for example, the training provided by Argentina; status of international military cooperation or assistance programs, such as the kinds of military support that might be offered by China, Iran, Venezuela, Taiwan, or other countries. – Plans and intentions for weapons and equipment acquisitions, including details on suppliers. – Reactions to major arms acquisitions by countries in the region. – Paraguayan views on Venezuelan and Bolivian military actions and activities, in particular, Bolivian deployments near the border of Paraguay. – Indigenous R&D, production, repair, maintenance or upgrade of military material. – Details on joint cooperation or co-production arrangements. – Details on military command, control, communications, computer and intelligence (C4I) systems. – Biographic and financial information and biometric data on military leaders.
3) GRPO can provide text of this issue and related requirements.
4) Health and Medical Developments (HLTH-4) – Infectious disease outbreaks; national strategies for dealing with infectious disease, including detection and control. – Capabilities and quality of medical care in private, public, and military medical facilities. – Disaster planning and response capability. – Sources, locations and levels of environmental and chemical contamination of air, water, food, and soil that might affect health; content and location of toxic industrial chemical production and storage facilities.
E. Information Infrastructure and Telecommunications (INFR-4) – Details of telecommunications and information systems, networks, and technologies supporting Paraguayan national leadership, military, foreign intelligence and security services (FISS), and civil sector communications. – Define Paraguayan wireless infrastructure, cellular provider information, and makes/models of cellular phones and their operating systems. – Define Paraguayan satellite communications infrastructure, to include VSAT networks and use of point to point systems. – Information on communications practices of Paraguayan government and military leaders, key foreign officials in country (e.g., Cuban, Venezuelan, Bolivian, Iranian, or Chinese diplomats), and criminal entities or their surrogates, to include telephone and fax numbers and e-mail addresses, call activity (date, time, caller numbers, recipient numbers), phone books, cell phone numbers, telephone and fax user listings, internet protocol (IP) addresses, user accounts, and passwords. – Identify national and supranational telecommunications regulatory, administrative, and maintenance organizations. – Identify scope of Paraguayan telecommunications encryption efforts, details on the use of and efforts to acquire modern telecom technologies, regional and national telecommunications policies, programs and regulations. – Details on information repositories associated with RFID enabled systems increasingly used for passports, government badges, and transportation system RICE
Genital Herpes Contagious
Jews out in Landsberg am Lech, January 1951
"Jews out!" in Landsberg am Lech, January 1951: A demonstration in favor of
Nazi criminals end up in an anti-Semitic rally.
Seldom in the history of the Federal Republic was led such a bitter past political debate as it was 60 years ago, in January 1951. At its center the tranquil Bavarian town of Landsberg am Lech stood where clashed in a special way German guilt defense and the desire of the survivors to terms with the Nazi crimes. Landsberg would be unlikely to get into the focus of world attention and in the history books, if not from 1923 to 1958 would have played a special role in the history of National Socialism and its consequences.
It began in 1923 with Adolf Hitler's imprisonment in Landsberg prison. The Nazi leader was sentenced after his Munich putsch of November 9, 1923 for high treason to five years' fortress. During this time, Landsberg developed a pilgrimage site for all the Nazis from the start. This held even after Hitler's early release in December 1924 not much - certainly not in 1933 when they made the "Hitler-cell" to a place of pilgrimage.
In the last year of the war were Landsberg and the adjacent Kaufering scene of horrible crimes. Around the place to bunker be built for the production of fighter aircraft. For the construction of these bunkers Albert Speer drew the subordinate organization Todt between June 1944 and April 1945 approached up to 30,000 mainly Jewish concentration camp prisoners. They were housed in camps hastily set up and had to live in tents and foxholes. About half of the inmates did not experience the war. Several cemeteries concentration camp at Landsberg now show the mass deaths in the camps.
The "victor's justice" deprived the German people of his "honor"
The survivors were following its liberation by the Americans in late April 1945 Displaced Persons (DPs). Many had lost their entire family in the Holocaust and could or would not return to their destroyed or disappeared from the map of homes in Eastern Europe. The Americans brought in under the Landsberger Saarburg Barracks, which was at times over 6000 residents quickly become the largest DP camp in Bavaria - stop looking for a new home. When the camp was closed in November 1950, it had passed 23,000 people.
was not the only victims of Nazism it after 1945 in Landsberg, but also perpetrators. Whether the Americans aware of the local prison as a central place of detention for Nazi war criminals and elected, as Hitler had been sitting open question. What is certain is that one of the remaining intact City decided also because it was not far from Dachau, were conducted where 1945-1948, most U.S. military trials of Nazi perpetrators. The Nuremberg in the subsequent processes condemned the Americans brought in the War Criminal Prison No. Landsberger. 1,. Here also, the death sentences were carried out: more than 250 Nazi war criminals were killed in this prison until 1951 on the gallows.
was
After initial approval to the trials of major war criminals, the majority of the German population, the Nuremberg Trials against lawyers, doctors, diplomats and entrepreneurs, but also against SS officers opposed and defended it as "victor's justice" from. Save this debt resulted in a comprehensive reinterpretation of history: not only the convicted war criminals believed to victims, but with them the whole German people, that suffer from his "honor" deprived, under Allied "arbitrariness" and injustice.
It urged the pardon of the convicted person to imprisonment and, in particular, those upon whom the death sentence was imposed. Not all were immediately executed. Some "Redcoats," as the condemned were called because of their special prison clothes remained, because of lengthy review process for years in the dark about the execution of her sentence - including Oswald Pohl, the chief of the SS Economic Administration Main Office for the mass death of slave laborers in concentration camps had been directly responsible, and Otto Ohlendorf, the 1941/42 in the occupied Soviet Union as commander of the SD Einsatzgruppen D, the murder of tens of thousands of Jewish children, women and men ordered and directed had.
In Landsberg, many identified with the convicted Nazi criminals
Many German found it especially inhumane, that had to remain on death row for so long between hope and fear. It developed into a broad campaign for the "Landsberger" - especially since the fall of 1950 after the U.S. government had publicly suggested the West German rearmament. Now hoped politicians of almost all parties in Bonn, the German approval for re-arming of the pardon make above all the death row by the Americans can depend on. Even men of the church and the business community argued forcefully for the condemned.
came under pressure in front of all of the High Commissioner John J. McCloy, who passed shortly after he took office in the summer of 1949 a review of the petitions in the way that his decision had not yet announced. In December 1950, the campaign became so hostile that McCloy was forced because of anonymous death threats to his children can be protected by bodyguards.
the center of the protests was the city of Landsberg. There are many identified with the convicted Nazi perpetrators. In mid-November 1950, a City Council in a resolution supported by all political groups "for the inmates of the prison war crimes," which among other things to Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and Pope Pius XII. went.
While the German public increasingly impatient waiting for the decision McCloy, spread on Friday 5 January 1951, in Bonn, the rumor that should the condemned on Wednesday the 10th be executed in January. Immediately organized protests. The most active Gebhard Seelos, leader of the Bavarian party was in the Bundestag. He came to the country's Lord Mayor Ludwig Thoma match together for Sunday, 7 January, call for a rally on the Landsberger main square. Quick was found under other Federal and State Parliament from the region alliance comrades. Only the Communists refused to. Views on the radio and a sound truck, lodged by a local electronics house free of charge, asked the Government to the citizens to participate in the rally. The response was astonishing: Despite the short period were found on Sunday a 4,000 people in the main square - that was about one-third of the population.
by Following the opening of the "protest against the inhumanity of" Lord Mayor Thoma said the first speaker of the CSU member of parliament and former SA members Richard Jaeger. He appealed to the Americans, the "voice of the heart to listen" and to refrain from enforcement of death sentences. Every single human life should "be taken as an absolute value. For the later Federal Minister of Justice who should be the reinstatement of the death penalty in the sixties, one of the most vocal proponents ("head-from-Jaeger"), were the amazing words.
occurred as the main speaker at the initiator of the rally, Gebhard Seelos on. The lawyer and former diplomat was actually suspicion of being a sympathizer of convicted Nazi perpetrators. Because Differences with the Nazi Party members, he was dismissed in 1944 from the Foreign Service and had in April 1945 at the Bavarian Catholic resistance to the regime involved. Six years later, it did not prevent the party to take the war criminals. In "sharp attacks that Landsberger news wrote on 8 January, he was against the Nuremberg trials, and "placed the assets are the German people, which demanded his right and justice demand." The rally, called Seelos, representing "the whole German people, who reject any injustice, regardless of" whether it was committed before or after 1945. " "Stormy applause" He earned his call to Americans: Stop 'cruel to smash this game, not the sacred possessions of Christianity, humanity and justice "
parts of his speech, however, went under in riots!. For had immediately before the start of the rally about 300 Holocaust survivors who came from a nearby DP camp in Landsberg, as protesters gathered on the edge of the square. They wanted to remember the 90,000 victims Ohlendorf. While it had remained largely quiet in recent speeches, the Nazi victims were now trying to disrupt Seelos' speech by heckling. This led to skirmishes and battles of words with Landsberger citizens. From the set were "Jews out! to hear "-calls. The conflict ended only when police intervened and took several Jewish DPs in custody. "Attempts of foreign interference DPs" nipped in the bud, it was called the next day to the Landsberger messages.
the pardon rally provoked nationwide attention
After the "oppressive situation," as the mayor described the events later, had calmed down, the rally went undisturbed to the end. Then held the DPs from their memorial service. Not surprisingly, the Nazi persecution still remained among them, which was also the mayor of his country to leave the square Berger had asked for. Nevertheless, some people stayed and made sure that the announcement of the speaker of the DPs, in future every year commemoration "for to 90000 murdered by Ohlendorf Jews organize in the city do," was drowned out by whistles and catcalls, "as the Nuremberg News reported.
the pardon rally provoked nationwide attention, although not in the sense of its organizers. Rather, developed the "key and finest hour [...] free and proud citizens," as Mayor Thoma the rally outside the City Council, described the media to disaster. In the national press, which otherwise mainly in the chorus of those matched, who demanded a pardon of prisoners, namely, there was absolutely critical voices. The Sueddeutsche Zeitung wrote about, Landsberger had let "their event to a world-class anti-Semitic incitement degenerate," and the Bavarian Radio had similar comments heard.
The sharpest and best-known critics of the event was part of the Auschwitz survivors Philipp Auerbach, president of the Bavarian State compensation office and member of the Board of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. The day before the demonstration had already spread to the Central Council a statement that he "in the hour of demonstrations and appeals to the Landsberger murderer, "remember it," that the men who work for churches and political parties, mass murderers who have the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his conscience "and therefore had no claim to mercy. A few days after the demonstration Auerbach reiterated this position in a radio commentary. He complained that just Landsberger himself had gathered for a demonstration in favor of the war: against the murder of thousands of people in the camps around Landsberg had not raised his voice.
This referred not only to those who knew Auerbach and complicity of many Landsberger in the years 1944-45, but on an unworthy debate that had already created a stir in 1949. At that time, had been arguing about how many people were killed in the Landsberg concentration camps. Auerbach had spoken of 60,000 victims. Many locals have insisted there were "more than 4000" was dead. One of the fiercest opponents Auerbach was in this macabre dispute was the former Nazi Party member Paul Winkelmayer, editor in chief of the Landsberg news and leader of the CSU in the City Council. Winkelmayer missed no opportunity to belittle the horror figures. Only a commission appointed by the district, which includes both victims of Nazism also Winkelmayer and Mayor Thoma, had finally witness interviews agreed on the rather arbitrary figure of 14,500 dead concentration camp in the district of Landsberg.
Auerbach was familiar with his opponents already well off as he went public in January 1951 to protest against the field. He also called on Mayor education about anti-Semitism. Thoma rejected any criticism. The rally, he wrote to Auerbach, had it not been for the defense of war crimes, but was a "protest for right and justice, was" for human rights.
that he in fact very different thought is clear in many other letters, such as to Princess Helene von Isenburg, as the "Mother of the prisoners at Landsberg" was known nationwide. He assured her in February 1951, he was "always in the spirit of your efforts.
is even more clearly his position in a revealing letter he sent shortly after the rally to Pohl, Ohlendorf and the other condemned men. "Dear particularly hard on the skill involved men! As I learned [...] you knew about the rally last Sunday at the historic market place in mountain country once again one of such rare moments in life. You have again drawn strength and hope. This was also the deeper meaning of the event. connected in spirit with you, we wanted to once again shake up the world's conscience. "
In Bonn, you show understanding for the "countermeasures"
In Bonn, you show understanding for the "countermeasures" Landsberger
similar tones, sometimes even openly anti-Semitic beat, especially on city editor and city council angle Mayer, and also from Bonn, there was backing for the pronounced Landsberger victim awareness . Richard Jaeger showed about the end of January 1951 in a letter to the ST Editor-Ernst Müller-Meiningen understanding of the "countermeasures" Landsberger "against the Jewish DPs, as he warned that" the citizenship of the city of Landsberg, after all, with some reason more such warm feelings toward the DPs entertains as they did so great in their majority before 05/08/1945. " Given the mass death in the camps around Landsberg 1944/45, the most watched passively or locals that they had actively supported, this was a remarkable record. It shows clearly how much the weights between victims and perpetrators in the period between the surrender in May 1945 and the German protest against the Nuremberg judgments were shifted in the winter of 1950/51.
The alleged execution date on January 10 passed, moreover, without anything happening. This was not further surprising, because even John McCloy had not even announced the result of his request for clemency-review. This happened only three Weeks later. On 31 January gave McCloy and General Thomas T. Handy, as the top U.S. commander in Europe, the responsibility for the offender was in Dachau, announced their decision. Of the 28 death sentences should be carried out seven, all others were converted to prison terms. After the exhaustion of the last appeal was sentenced to death, including Oswald Pohl and Otto Ohlendorf, seventh on the seven June under strong protests from the population executed.
could Subsequently, the Americans, the remaining 500 prisoners still on Landsberger gradually released. With the early release of the last four prisoners on 9 May 1958, the War Criminal Prison No.. 1 History.
Philip Auerbach, who had campaigned so vigorously against the solidarity with the perpetrators and the reinterpretation of history, did not live the liberation of the Nazi criminals. Just weeks after the Landsberger rally he was arrested for alleged misappropriation of money within his compensation authority. There was a doubtful and by the Bavarian Justice Minister Josef Müller (CSU) politically exploited procedure on 14 August 1952 ended with the sentencing to prison. The night after the verdict took Auerbach, who had protested his innocence to the end, life. Auerbach was honored only by the French government, which distinguished him with the highest medal of the Resistance.
"Jews out!" in Landsberg am Lech, January 1951: A demonstration in favor of
Nazi criminals end up in an anti-Semitic rally.
Seldom in the history of the Federal Republic was led such a bitter past political debate as it was 60 years ago, in January 1951. At its center the tranquil Bavarian town of Landsberg am Lech stood where clashed in a special way German guilt defense and the desire of the survivors to terms with the Nazi crimes. Landsberg would be unlikely to get into the focus of world attention and in the history books, if not from 1923 to 1958 would have played a special role in the history of National Socialism and its consequences.
It began in 1923 with Adolf Hitler's imprisonment in Landsberg prison. The Nazi leader was sentenced after his Munich putsch of November 9, 1923 for high treason to five years' fortress. During this time, Landsberg developed a pilgrimage site for all the Nazis from the start. This held even after Hitler's early release in December 1924 not much - certainly not in 1933 when they made the "Hitler-cell" to a place of pilgrimage.
In the last year of the war were Landsberg and the adjacent Kaufering scene of horrible crimes. Around the place to bunker be built for the production of fighter aircraft. For the construction of these bunkers Albert Speer drew the subordinate organization Todt between June 1944 and April 1945 approached up to 30,000 mainly Jewish concentration camp prisoners. They were housed in camps hastily set up and had to live in tents and foxholes. About half of the inmates did not experience the war. Several cemeteries concentration camp at Landsberg now show the mass deaths in the camps.
The "victor's justice" deprived the German people of his "honor"
The survivors were following its liberation by the Americans in late April 1945 Displaced Persons (DPs). Many had lost their entire family in the Holocaust and could or would not return to their destroyed or disappeared from the map of homes in Eastern Europe. The Americans brought in under the Landsberger Saarburg Barracks, which was at times over 6000 residents quickly become the largest DP camp in Bavaria - stop looking for a new home. When the camp was closed in November 1950, it had passed 23,000 people.
was not the only victims of Nazism it after 1945 in Landsberg, but also perpetrators. Whether the Americans aware of the local prison as a central place of detention for Nazi war criminals and elected, as Hitler had been sitting open question. What is certain is that one of the remaining intact City decided also because it was not far from Dachau, were conducted where 1945-1948, most U.S. military trials of Nazi perpetrators. The Nuremberg in the subsequent processes condemned the Americans brought in the War Criminal Prison No. Landsberger. 1,. Here also, the death sentences were carried out: more than 250 Nazi war criminals were killed in this prison until 1951 on the gallows.
was
After initial approval to the trials of major war criminals, the majority of the German population, the Nuremberg Trials against lawyers, doctors, diplomats and entrepreneurs, but also against SS officers opposed and defended it as "victor's justice" from. Save this debt resulted in a comprehensive reinterpretation of history: not only the convicted war criminals believed to victims, but with them the whole German people, that suffer from his "honor" deprived, under Allied "arbitrariness" and injustice.
It urged the pardon of the convicted person to imprisonment and, in particular, those upon whom the death sentence was imposed. Not all were immediately executed. Some "Redcoats," as the condemned were called because of their special prison clothes remained, because of lengthy review process for years in the dark about the execution of her sentence - including Oswald Pohl, the chief of the SS Economic Administration Main Office for the mass death of slave laborers in concentration camps had been directly responsible, and Otto Ohlendorf, the 1941/42 in the occupied Soviet Union as commander of the SD Einsatzgruppen D, the murder of tens of thousands of Jewish children, women and men ordered and directed had.
In Landsberg, many identified with the convicted Nazi criminals
Many German found it especially inhumane, that had to remain on death row for so long between hope and fear. It developed into a broad campaign for the "Landsberger" - especially since the fall of 1950 after the U.S. government had publicly suggested the West German rearmament. Now hoped politicians of almost all parties in Bonn, the German approval for re-arming of the pardon make above all the death row by the Americans can depend on. Even men of the church and the business community argued forcefully for the condemned.
came under pressure in front of all of the High Commissioner John J. McCloy, who passed shortly after he took office in the summer of 1949 a review of the petitions in the way that his decision had not yet announced. In December 1950, the campaign became so hostile that McCloy was forced because of anonymous death threats to his children can be protected by bodyguards.
the center of the protests was the city of Landsberg. There are many identified with the convicted Nazi perpetrators. In mid-November 1950, a City Council in a resolution supported by all political groups "for the inmates of the prison war crimes," which among other things to Chancellor Konrad Adenauer and Pope Pius XII. went.
While the German public increasingly impatient waiting for the decision McCloy, spread on Friday 5 January 1951, in Bonn, the rumor that should the condemned on Wednesday the 10th be executed in January. Immediately organized protests. The most active Gebhard Seelos, leader of the Bavarian party was in the Bundestag. He came to the country's Lord Mayor Ludwig Thoma match together for Sunday, 7 January, call for a rally on the Landsberger main square. Quick was found under other Federal and State Parliament from the region alliance comrades. Only the Communists refused to. Views on the radio and a sound truck, lodged by a local electronics house free of charge, asked the Government to the citizens to participate in the rally. The response was astonishing: Despite the short period were found on Sunday a 4,000 people in the main square - that was about one-third of the population.
by Following the opening of the "protest against the inhumanity of" Lord Mayor Thoma said the first speaker of the CSU member of parliament and former SA members Richard Jaeger. He appealed to the Americans, the "voice of the heart to listen" and to refrain from enforcement of death sentences. Every single human life should "be taken as an absolute value. For the later Federal Minister of Justice who should be the reinstatement of the death penalty in the sixties, one of the most vocal proponents ("head-from-Jaeger"), were the amazing words.
occurred as the main speaker at the initiator of the rally, Gebhard Seelos on. The lawyer and former diplomat was actually suspicion of being a sympathizer of convicted Nazi perpetrators. Because Differences with the Nazi Party members, he was dismissed in 1944 from the Foreign Service and had in April 1945 at the Bavarian Catholic resistance to the regime involved. Six years later, it did not prevent the party to take the war criminals. In "sharp attacks that Landsberger news wrote on 8 January, he was against the Nuremberg trials, and "placed the assets are the German people, which demanded his right and justice demand." The rally, called Seelos, representing "the whole German people, who reject any injustice, regardless of" whether it was committed before or after 1945. " "Stormy applause" He earned his call to Americans: Stop 'cruel to smash this game, not the sacred possessions of Christianity, humanity and justice "
parts of his speech, however, went under in riots!. For had immediately before the start of the rally about 300 Holocaust survivors who came from a nearby DP camp in Landsberg, as protesters gathered on the edge of the square. They wanted to remember the 90,000 victims Ohlendorf. While it had remained largely quiet in recent speeches, the Nazi victims were now trying to disrupt Seelos' speech by heckling. This led to skirmishes and battles of words with Landsberger citizens. From the set were "Jews out! to hear "-calls. The conflict ended only when police intervened and took several Jewish DPs in custody. "Attempts of foreign interference DPs" nipped in the bud, it was called the next day to the Landsberger messages.
the pardon rally provoked nationwide attention
After the "oppressive situation," as the mayor described the events later, had calmed down, the rally went undisturbed to the end. Then held the DPs from their memorial service. Not surprisingly, the Nazi persecution still remained among them, which was also the mayor of his country to leave the square Berger had asked for. Nevertheless, some people stayed and made sure that the announcement of the speaker of the DPs, in future every year commemoration "for to 90000 murdered by Ohlendorf Jews organize in the city do," was drowned out by whistles and catcalls, "as the Nuremberg News reported.
the pardon rally provoked nationwide attention, although not in the sense of its organizers. Rather, developed the "key and finest hour [...] free and proud citizens," as Mayor Thoma the rally outside the City Council, described the media to disaster. In the national press, which otherwise mainly in the chorus of those matched, who demanded a pardon of prisoners, namely, there was absolutely critical voices. The Sueddeutsche Zeitung wrote about, Landsberger had let "their event to a world-class anti-Semitic incitement degenerate," and the Bavarian Radio had similar comments heard.
The sharpest and best-known critics of the event was part of the Auschwitz survivors Philipp Auerbach, president of the Bavarian State compensation office and member of the Board of the Central Council of Jews in Germany. The day before the demonstration had already spread to the Central Council a statement that he "in the hour of demonstrations and appeals to the Landsberger murderer, "remember it," that the men who work for churches and political parties, mass murderers who have the deaths of hundreds of thousands on his conscience "and therefore had no claim to mercy. A few days after the demonstration Auerbach reiterated this position in a radio commentary. He complained that just Landsberger himself had gathered for a demonstration in favor of the war: against the murder of thousands of people in the camps around Landsberg had not raised his voice.
This referred not only to those who knew Auerbach and complicity of many Landsberger in the years 1944-45, but on an unworthy debate that had already created a stir in 1949. At that time, had been arguing about how many people were killed in the Landsberg concentration camps. Auerbach had spoken of 60,000 victims. Many locals have insisted there were "more than 4000" was dead. One of the fiercest opponents Auerbach was in this macabre dispute was the former Nazi Party member Paul Winkelmayer, editor in chief of the Landsberg news and leader of the CSU in the City Council. Winkelmayer missed no opportunity to belittle the horror figures. Only a commission appointed by the district, which includes both victims of Nazism also Winkelmayer and Mayor Thoma, had finally witness interviews agreed on the rather arbitrary figure of 14,500 dead concentration camp in the district of Landsberg.
Auerbach was familiar with his opponents already well off as he went public in January 1951 to protest against the field. He also called on Mayor education about anti-Semitism. Thoma rejected any criticism. The rally, he wrote to Auerbach, had it not been for the defense of war crimes, but was a "protest for right and justice, was" for human rights.
that he in fact very different thought is clear in many other letters, such as to Princess Helene von Isenburg, as the "Mother of the prisoners at Landsberg" was known nationwide. He assured her in February 1951, he was "always in the spirit of your efforts.
is even more clearly his position in a revealing letter he sent shortly after the rally to Pohl, Ohlendorf and the other condemned men. "Dear particularly hard on the skill involved men! As I learned [...] you knew about the rally last Sunday at the historic market place in mountain country once again one of such rare moments in life. You have again drawn strength and hope. This was also the deeper meaning of the event. connected in spirit with you, we wanted to once again shake up the world's conscience. "
In Bonn, you show understanding for the "countermeasures"
In Bonn, you show understanding for the "countermeasures" Landsberger
similar tones, sometimes even openly anti-Semitic beat, especially on city editor and city council angle Mayer, and also from Bonn, there was backing for the pronounced Landsberger victim awareness . Richard Jaeger showed about the end of January 1951 in a letter to the ST Editor-Ernst Müller-Meiningen understanding of the "countermeasures" Landsberger "against the Jewish DPs, as he warned that" the citizenship of the city of Landsberg, after all, with some reason more such warm feelings toward the DPs entertains as they did so great in their majority before 05/08/1945. " Given the mass death in the camps around Landsberg 1944/45, the most watched passively or locals that they had actively supported, this was a remarkable record. It shows clearly how much the weights between victims and perpetrators in the period between the surrender in May 1945 and the German protest against the Nuremberg judgments were shifted in the winter of 1950/51.
The alleged execution date on January 10 passed, moreover, without anything happening. This was not further surprising, because even John McCloy had not even announced the result of his request for clemency-review. This happened only three Weeks later. On 31 January gave McCloy and General Thomas T. Handy, as the top U.S. commander in Europe, the responsibility for the offender was in Dachau, announced their decision. Of the 28 death sentences should be carried out seven, all others were converted to prison terms. After the exhaustion of the last appeal was sentenced to death, including Oswald Pohl and Otto Ohlendorf, seventh on the seven June under strong protests from the population executed.
could Subsequently, the Americans, the remaining 500 prisoners still on Landsberger gradually released. With the early release of the last four prisoners on 9 May 1958, the War Criminal Prison No.. 1 History.
Philip Auerbach, who had campaigned so vigorously against the solidarity with the perpetrators and the reinterpretation of history, did not live the liberation of the Nazi criminals. Just weeks after the Landsberger rally he was arrested for alleged misappropriation of money within his compensation authority. There was a doubtful and by the Bavarian Justice Minister Josef Müller (CSU) politically exploited procedure on 14 August 1952 ended with the sentencing to prison. The night after the verdict took Auerbach, who had protested his innocence to the end, life. Auerbach was honored only by the French government, which distinguished him with the highest medal of the Resistance.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
New York Drivers License Template Free
Generation in Transition
Many things change in the new modern age. Our century is to economic, social and above all of the serious policy challenges. Sun is also very particular to the field of health, prevention and care of the elderly to a big task. People are getting older and are concerned about their last period of life is in itself immersed in discussions. Many of the citizens of complete self-protection and preparedness is a care insurance . This concerns to the citizens, should the case arise and they need care in old age.
is in a welfare state but to be covered by pension and social security. However, you can not Expect that social support can also provide those services that can be hoped for even in age, or one for family members want. Another reason for the additional private insurance should lie in the fact that you absolutely can not assess how the development of social security benefits continues in the state. Anyone with the political events in the European countries followed only a little can observe that the leaders are well aware that social welfare is long gone to decline. The current elderly have more or less lucky and can see themselves as relatively well-supplied. In a few years the situation will, however, look very different. For this reason, it is really worth the one or the other to see private health insurance compared deals and obtain on their own feet.
The monthly payments and contributions can indeed be chosen entirely by the financial possibilities. And who starts early enough with the saving that would have in the pension then sufficient funds on the page. In the case of insurance, there are different services in the package. Basically, you should have for private nursing and medical care to hedge. All other additional services can be considered.
Many things change in the new modern age. Our century is to economic, social and above all of the serious policy challenges. Sun is also very particular to the field of health, prevention and care of the elderly to a big task. People are getting older and are concerned about their last period of life is in itself immersed in discussions. Many of the citizens of complete self-protection and preparedness is a care insurance . This concerns to the citizens, should the case arise and they need care in old age.
is in a welfare state but to be covered by pension and social security. However, you can not Expect that social support can also provide those services that can be hoped for even in age, or one for family members want. Another reason for the additional private insurance should lie in the fact that you absolutely can not assess how the development of social security benefits continues in the state. Anyone with the political events in the European countries followed only a little can observe that the leaders are well aware that social welfare is long gone to decline. The current elderly have more or less lucky and can see themselves as relatively well-supplied. In a few years the situation will, however, look very different. For this reason, it is really worth the one or the other to see private health insurance compared deals and obtain on their own feet.
The monthly payments and contributions can indeed be chosen entirely by the financial possibilities. And who starts early enough with the saving that would have in the pension then sufficient funds on the page. In the case of insurance, there are different services in the package. Basically, you should have for private nursing and medical care to hedge. All other additional services can be considered.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)