Guttenberg lying on
praises Written by Jochen Hoff
In his statement, Mr. Guttenberg himself that he had stated on Friday that he would temporarily take the new song. On Friday he wants to do without, however, had declared that he temporarily flying on the track until the few errors were then cleared with the University of Bayreuth and then he would take the title again.
In the video from the election campaign in Kelkheim he also states that there were serious mistakes, and he in the seven years of work on the thesis track of the sources have lost. But that's his opinion, all no plagiarism. The truth about his work can be found in the interim report of his plagiarism on GuttenPlag Wiki of 21 February 30th by 17 clock But even this level at which at 271 pages, which were equivalent to 68.96 percent of its work, plagiarism found. But even this figure is already outdated and looks at present like this:
pages where plagiarism were found (black). The Table of Contents (pages 1-14) and Annexes, page 408 (blue) were not included in calculating the percentage. Pages with imitations of various sources are shown in red
© http://de.guttenplag.wikia.com/wiki/GuttenPlag_Wiki
Who speaks for so many plagiarism locations of errors are lying. These are not errors but deliberate acts. The type of plagiarism in other shows to many observers that it is not plagiarism by him is himself, but that the totality of the work rather comes from a ghostwriter. But the time spent talking to the need for such work would be:
The Law and Economics Faculty of the University of Bayreuth had the work in 2006 as the dissertation. At that time, Guttenberg was not ministers, but in the Bundestag, already chairman of the CDU / CSU Group in the Foreign Affairs Committee, and for that he was amongst a number of honorary posts more than half a dozen other leading features in his party and in national and international political bodies. You have almost the 25th Hour of the day believe if you look at the stress of the KTG students will paint so well.
This is supported but also that Guttenberg is of the otherwise so self-centered man in his work and in his first public evaluation of his work so strange about talking stilted to the person of the authors:
Unlike books or speeches by top executives , top politicians and other celebrities are on this lower level of academic nevertheless sought orders allowed, no ghostwriter. And here is exactly the case Guttenberg might really explosive.
So far so do not understand why an intelligent, confident man like Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg should have refrained deliberately, about an honorable columnist of the "Neue Zürcher Zeitung", or a renowned professor with a text review of the FAZ is not named and quote reference? Especially in the last and most usually considered a foreword of such a study. As with dozens of other places where KTG apparently used since as foreign sales and springs, the would-be doctor no teeth had fallen out of the crown, if he had correctly quoted and therefore unassailable.
But why are these hardly understandable omission happened? His possible "errors" Guttenberg says something nebulous. "There was, however, disappointed at no time aware of or the authority of others made do not identify" the one who usually only too happy to say "I", the process moves at once to the level of "It". Strange, that has already alarmed Chancellor of such information satisfactory and even "offensive" called.
For who is this "it"?
time you'll get the affair Guttenberg no quotes affair, to which it or its (less expectant) defender want to minimize the matter. Even in the digital age Guttenberg disappear for long quotations is no coincidence both punctuation (arrival and transfers) and also to the normal scientific or journalistic and documentary work attached Directory. It is because the sequential numbering of footnotes adapt differently to the old typewriter days when someone calls, can, they should not demonstrate in later, spontaneous, last minute inserted text parts are lost.
..
The amount and type of "error", the small but apparently deliberate changes of details in the non-designated foreign texts and the stylistic Fractures of the whole would be better explained, if written down here, for example, parts of speeches and lectures, the assistants, lecturers and temporary workers for the busy politician or zusammengeklaubt simplicity of foreign texts have input would have found in the dissertation. This much may yet explain the unexplained or make it understandable that a go-getting Turbo politician on the academic side show might lose track of "his" material - and also pushed in a mixture of ignorance of the power and intoxicating, ambitious demands on himself.
is now the Baron a PhD going on. What remains of the fraud is to admit he does not want. But that's not all. It is also the abuse of a research department of the Bundestag. Previously known only that he has asked Councilor Ulrich Tammler him a paper on "The question of a reference to God in the U.S. Constitution and the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court for the separation of church and state" to deliver. Now the focus has established the Guttenberg has used another work that William Weege by the Scientific Service of the Bundestag is entitled "The U.S. role in the European integration process by the end of the East-West conflict" written. Guttenberg has modified the work is minimal and not the source reported. This is theft of property of the Bundestag.
But not only has the federal claims against him and many others are affected, and David Klein asks the right questions:
Actually, I will lose no word on the matter because the facts (and now also the minister himself) speak for themselves and also gives the only bad karma for my work. But you ask yourself, what would happen if suddenly all the "forgotten" authors assert their claim for injunctive relief - § § 12, 13, 63 Copyright Act can be read even once. Or what happens to § 132a of the Criminal Code, if the awarding of doctorates was unlawful and § 48 of the Administrative Procedure Act comes into play.
Oh yes. Our judicial system and a Baron, who is also a big shot in politics, multi-millionaire friend of the Springer press, and federal ministers. No, because there is no hope. Each display is set against him mercilessly. Hunted in Germany by the judiciary only the weak. It's just a class justice. Guttenberg feels confident and wants to hide himself in front of the Bundestag again cowardly:
Berlin (dts News Agency) - According to CSU Group CEO Stefan Müller issues would be expected to answer "by the present parliamentary secretaries. Guttenberg, but would likely participate in the parliamentary debate on the allegations against him.
But since there is already a change. For the Baron run slowly but surely it's supporters. While CDU Secretary-General Hermann Gröhe and the Union Group Chairman Volker Kauder the affair Guttenberg with the excuses and lies in Kelkheim want to quit, wants to bring Bundestag President Norbert Lammert, the matter before the Elders of the Bundestag and is already talking of "sloppiness".
course, Angela Merkel, the Springer press and the Colourful still stand behind Guttenberg, but the other hope for the future of the CDU, Ursula von der Leyen begins already with its cautious disengagement:
Labour Minister Ursula von der Leyen (CDU) sees her Cabinet colleague, Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg (CSU) in view of the discussion on his doctoral work in a "difficult situation".
Berlin (dts News Agency) - A final assessment did not give von der Leyen. "As he makes the allegations and makes a clean sweep, will decide on which picture do the people of him as a politician."
How does he do to show the video at the top. He tries to durchzulügen. As Federal Minister of Economics has Guttenberg is work out the "Act to Amend the Banking Law" by the British law firm Linklaters completely . Let When Kundusaffäre he lied to Parliament and the public and released at the end of the Inspector General Wolfgang Schneiderhan and the Secretary of State Peter Wichert as pawns in order to protect his own person.
lousy still was his behavior towards Brigadier General Henning Hars, who had asked the minister of war in a letter to the reasons for the dismissal of Hans Schneider and was treated for it in retirement. The troops should not just ask or think, but die for the glory of the Baron without complaint and make a nice stage for his performances.
calls even in the FAZ Berthold Köhler already managed to withdraw Guttenberg:
Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg, is of two letters apart, back to his usual: the forward defense. After a week in the storm of criticism as the "Franconian Weather fir," as he calls himself, seen as it was spring, and teetering in the woods, most recently in the forest of Kelkheim. To forestall the threat of withdrawing his Ph.D., he has, which asked for a Baron d'etat, the University of Bayreuth, him to recognize the title.
was in this affair - a dissertation is to be made without outside help - no other accused available to the poor preliminary work, in retirement could be sent or suspended. To save his office has Guttenberg This time his own doctor dismissed.
..
The Chancellor wants to go away for obvious reasons, the latter, at least outwardly. The damage within the universe of civic values, drawn by the operation to rescue the gestural stumbled standard bearer for themselves, but also Mrs Merkel miss them.
The action, it is possible for and everything is on the light, late consequences. Guttenberg had themselves the values that he cherishes, and also, the union proved a better service if he is not only the University of Bayreuth had written a letter, but also the Chancellor.
Yes, he would have even have to write this letter when he decency, dignity or even have morals. But it lacks not just in these traits, he lacks the courage above all. He cowardly tries to dodge any responsibility, while at the same time like other takes the responsibility. This must not let him pass, even if he is a beacon of hope or perhaps even the only hope of the Union.
Baron Guttenberg will always make mistakes, then the other must be straight. Eventually, such a mistake will mean many deaths. For his mistakes are not a defect, disability. He could not write doctoral work, he did not make key laws to be drawn up in his house, rather than give in a lobbying firm in order and also to pay more. He could not work up until the Kundusaffäre but had to immediately and completely false tear open the door because he was not interested in the facts. Short and bad. The Guttenberg can not.
The seven-league boots with which he is gehoppelt With strong American support of the German policy are up to him just too big and to avert further damage to Germany and other nations, it is now time to resign. Since he can not him, someone will have to resign. Ms Merkel and Mr Seehofer are required. It might work an!
0 comments:
Post a Comment